Rosh vs Roj @ Roshi — 100057/2023

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section order7Rule1. Status: For commission report. Next hearing: 23rd May 2026.

For commission report Next hearing 23-May-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLER240002692023

e-Filing Number

03-10-2023

Filing Number

100277/2023

Filing Date

04-Oct-2023

Registration No

100057/2023

Registration Date

04-Oct-2023

Court

Sub Court, Kochi

Judge

1-Sub / Assistant Sessions Judge

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section order7Rule1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rosh

    Adv. NIDHINKUMAR K B

  2. 2.Roby

    Adv. NIDHINKUMAR K B

  3. 3.Ronish

    Adv. NIDHINKUMAR K B

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Roj @ Roshi

Case History

  1. 23-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    For commission report

    Sub / Assistant Sessions Judge

  3. 11-Feb-2026

    Issue notice

    Sub / Assistant Sessions Judge

  4. 16-Jan-2026

    For commission report

    Sub / Assistant Sessions Judge

  5. 03-Dec-2025

    For commission report

    Sub / Assistant Sessions Judge

  6. 11-Nov-2025

    For commission report

    Sub / Assistant Sessions Judge

  7. 24-Oct-2025

    For commission report

    Sub / Assistant Sessions Judge

  8. 22-Sep-2025

    For commission report

    Sub / Assistant Sessions Judge

  9. 12-Aug-2025

    For commission report

    Sub / Assistant Sessions Judge

  10. 30-Jul-2025

    For Steps

    Sub / Assistant Sessions Judge

  11. 02-Jul-2025

    For Steps

    Sub / Assistant Sessions Judge

  12. 04-Jun-2025

    JudgementView PDF

  13. 04-Jun-2025

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary: The Court of Sub Judge, Kochi passed a preliminary decree in a property partition suit (O.S. No. 57/2023) allowing the plaintiffs' petition. The property is held jointly by three plaintiffs and one defendant as co-owners with equal shares. The court declared the property partible by metes and bounds into four equal shares, with the three plaintiffs collectively entitled to 3/4th share and separate possession, while the defendant receives 1/4th share. The suit costs shall be borne by the estate, and either party may apply for a final decree upon payment of requisite court fee. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 04-Jun-2025

    Order/ Judgement

    Sub / Assistant Sessions Judge

  15. 03-Jun-2025

    Order/ Judgement

    Sub / Assistant Sessions Judge

  16. 23-May-2025

    Order/ Judgement

    Sub / Assistant Sessions Judge

  17. 20-May-2025

    Further evidence

    Sub / Assistant Sessions Judge

  18. 11-Apr-2025

    Further evidence

    Sub / Assistant Sessions Judge

  19. 09-Apr-2025

    Further evidence

    Sub / Assistant Sessions Judge

  20. 03-Apr-2025

    Further evidence

    Sub / Assistant Sessions Judge

  21. 01-Apr-2025

    Listed to

    Sub / Assistant Sessions Judge

  22. 27-Jan-2025

    Listed to

    Sub / Assistant Sessions Judge

  23. 07-Dec-2024

    Pre trial steps

    Sub / Assistant Sessions Judge

  24. 18-Oct-2024

    Pre trial steps

    Sub / Assistant Sessions Judge

  25. 07-Aug-2024

    Issues

    Sub / Assistant Sessions Judge

  26. 05-Jun-2024

    Issues

    Sub / Assistant Sessions Judge

  27. 01-Apr-2024

    Payment of cost

    Sub / Assistant Sessions Judge

  28. 07-Mar-2024

    Payment of cost

    Sub / Assistant Sessions Judge

  29. 06-Feb-2024

    exparte evidence

    Sub / Assistant Sessions Judge

  30. 04-Jan-2024

    For Steps

    Sub / Assistant Sessions Judge

  31. 07-Dec-2023

    Written Statement

    Sub / Assistant Sessions Judge

  32. 07-Nov-2023

    Written Statement

    Sub / Assistant Sessions Judge

  33. 05-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 04-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100057/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Court of Sub Judge, Kochi passed a preliminary decree in a property partition suit (O.S. No. 57/2023) allowing the plaintiffs' petition. The property is held jointly by three plaintiffs and one defendant as co-owners with equal shares. The court declared the property partible by metes and bounds into four equal shares, with the three plaintiffs collectively entitled to 3/4th share and separate possession, while the defendant receives 1/4th share. The suit costs shall be borne by the estate, and either party may apply for a final decree upon payment of requisite court fee. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case