Union of India vs Kalidas@Mani@Sekhar Advocate - SAJEEV.C.K — 100002/2021
Case under Ipc \ Section 121,121A,122. Status: Call with MP. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLER170000022021
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
100002/2021
Filing Date
01-10-2021
Registration No
100002/2021
Registration Date
05-10-2021
Court
Special Court for NIA Cases or SPE.CBI-I, Ernakulam
Judge
1-Spl.Judge NIA -1
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Union of India
Adv. ARJUN A (Prosecutor NIA), ADV. SREENATH (Public Prosecutor)
Respondent(s)
Kalidas@Mani@Sekhar Advocate - SAJEEV.C.K
Danis@Krishna
Adv. SAJEEV.C.K
Rajan C.G @ Rajan Chittilappilly
Adv. THUSHAR NIRMAL SARATHY
Dinesh
Adv. THUSHAR NIRMAL SARATHY,Abdul Khader Kunju
T.K Rajeevan
Adv. THUSHAR NIRMAL SARATHY
Sreemathi
Adv. SAJEEV.C.K
Savithri
Adv. THUSHAR NIRMAL SARATHY
Vikram Gowda
Soman
Adv. THUSHAR NIRMAL SARATHY
Sharmila
Raghavendra
Adv. THUSHAR NIRMAL SARATHY
Santhosh Kumar
Adv. THUSHAR NIRMAL SARATHY,YASSER ARAFATH K.J.
Thiruvankadam
Adv. SAJEEV.C.K
B.G. Krishnamurthy
Adv. THUSHAR NIRMAL SARATHY
Deepak
Adv. THUSHAR NIRMAL SARATHY
Karthik
Adv. THUSHAR NIRMAL SARATHY
Ramesh
Adv. THUSHAR NIRMAL SARATHY
Ramesh @ Vasanth
Adv. THUSHAR NIRMAL SARATHY
Iyyappan
Adv. THUSHAR NIRMAL SARATHY,THUSHAR NIRMAL SARATHY
Aneesh Babu
Adv. THUSHAR NIRMAL SARATHY
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Spl.Judge NIA -1
Call with MP
Further evidence
Further evidence
Further evidence
Further evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Call with MP | |
| 08-04-2026 | Further evidence | |
| 07-04-2026 | Further evidence | |
| 06-04-2026 | Further evidence | |
| 19-03-2026 | Further evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition for modification of bail conditions was allowed. Dr. Dinesh D (Accused No. 4), who has been complying with existing bail conditions, sought relaxation to secure employment. The court modified the reporting requirement from twice weekly (Wednesday and Saturday) to once weekly (Monday forenoon), and added a condition requiring him to provide his mobile number and remain available throughout the day. All other bail conditions remain unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Order
Order
Summary: The petition for modification of bail conditions was allowed. Dr. Dinesh D (Accused No. 4), who has been complying with existing bail conditions, sought relaxation to secure employment. The court modified the reporting requirement from twice weekly (Wednesday and Saturday) to once weekly (Monday forenoon), and added a condition requiring him to provide his mobile number and remain available throughout the day. All other bail conditions remain unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts