The Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement vs Sabu K.S. — 200329/2017
Status: Call on. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLER160000182017
Filing Number
200329/2017
Filing Date
14-Aug-2017
Registration No
200329/2017
Registration Date
18-Jan-2022
Court
Special Court SPE.CBI-II, Ernakulam
Judge
1-Spl.Judge Cbi-2
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sabu K.S.
-
2.Lekha S.S.
-
3.Sunitha K.S.
-
4.Sreedharan Nair.K
-
5.J.Sivadasan Pillai
-
6.Harikumar K.S
-
7.Sureshkumar.T.S
-
8.S.Mangalan
Case History
-
02-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
Call on
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
17-Jan-2026
For evidence
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
17-Nov-2025
For evidence
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
27-Sep-2025
For evidence
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
22-Sep-2025
Call on
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
01-Sep-2025
For evidence
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
02-Jul-2025
For framing of charge
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
19-Jun-2025
For framing of charge
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
02-Jun-2025
Hearing on Charge
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
27-Feb-2025
Hearing on Charge
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
20-Nov-2024
Hearing on Charge
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
28-Oct-2024
For Hearing
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
05-Sep-2024
OrderView PDF
Court Order Summary Outcome: Discharge granted for five accused persons (Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7) in a money laundering case under PMLA, 2002. The court found insufficient evidence beyond weak statements recorded by ED officers to establish their knowledge or involvement in the alleged crime, determining that a trial would be futile without corroborating material evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Sep-2024
For Hearing
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
31-Aug-2024
Orders in Cmp
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
12-Aug-2024
For Hearing
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
12-Jul-2024
For Hearing
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
15-Jun-2024
Call with Mp
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
21-May-2024
Stayed. Call on
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
10-May-2024
Stayed. Call on
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
08-Apr-2024
Stayed. Call on
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
05-Apr-2024
Stayed. Call on
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
02-Mar-2024
Stayed. Call on
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
01-Feb-2024
OrderView PDF
-
01-Feb-2024
Stayed. Call on
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
23-Dec-2023
Stayed. Call on
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
04-Nov-2023
For Orders in Ea
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
30-Sep-2023
For Orders in Ea
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
26-Aug-2023
For Orders in Ea
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
05-Aug-2023
OrderView PDF
-
05-Aug-2023
For Orders in Ea
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
29-Jul-2023
For Orders in Ea
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
22-Jul-2023
For Orders in Ea
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
01-Jul-2023
For further hearing
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
14-Jun-2023
For further hearing
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
27-May-2023
For further hearing
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
01-Apr-2023
For further hearing
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
04-Mar-2023
For Orders in Ea
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
25-Feb-2023
For Orders in Ea
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
04-Feb-2023
For Hearing
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
21-Jan-2023
For Hearing
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
07-Jan-2023
For Hearing
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
17-Dec-2022
For Hearing
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
03-Dec-2022
For Hearing
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
26-Nov-2022
For Hearing
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
19-Nov-2022
Orders in Cmp
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
29-Oct-2022
For hearing in Cmp
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
22-Oct-2022
For hearing in Cmp
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
15-Oct-2022
For hearing in Cmp
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
24-Sep-2022
For framing of charge
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
03-Sep-2022
OrderView PDF
-
03-Sep-2022
For framing of charge
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
20-Aug-2022
For Hearing
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
30-Jul-2022
For Hearing
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
25-Jun-2022
Objection
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
28-May-2022
Objection
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
30-Apr-2022
Objection
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
25-Apr-2022
Call on
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
26-Mar-2022
Call on
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
05-Feb-2022
Call on
Spl.Judge Cbi-2
-
18-Jan-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Aug-2017
Case filed
Registration No. 200329/2017
Court Order Summary Outcome: Discharge granted for five accused persons (Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7) in a money laundering case under PMLA, 2002. The court found insufficient evidence beyond weak statements recorded by ED officers to establish their knowledge or involvement in the alleged crime, determining that a trial would be futile without corroborating material evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts