Anoop Kumar P vs Anu P Sasi Advocate - SADHANA KUMARI ESWARI, SADHANA KUMARI ESWARI, SADHANA KUMARI ESWARIAKHIL SOMAN, — 694/2025
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 29. Status: FOR HEARING. Next hearing: 23rd May 2026.
Crl.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: KLER010122622025
Next Hearing
23rd May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
5144/2025
Filing Date
02-12-2025
Registration No
694/2025
Registration Date
03-12-2025
Court
District and Sessions Court/Rent Control Appellate Authority, Ernakulam
Judge
2-First Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anoop Kumar P
Adv. SHAJNA MULLATH
Respondent(s)
Anu P Sasi Advocate - SADHANA KUMARI ESWARI, SADHANA KUMARI ESWARI, SADHANA KUMARI ESWARIAKHIL SOMAN,
Aswatha Anoop
Adv. SADHANA KUMARI ESWARI,SADHANA KUMARI ESWARI SADHANA KUMARI ESWARI AKHIL SOMAN
Ananandhitha Anoop
Adv. SADHANA KUMARI ESWARI,SADHANA KUMARI ESWARI SADHANA KUMARI ESWARI AKHIL SOMAN
STATE OF KERALA
Adv. SADHANA KUMARI ESWARI
Hearing History
Judge: 2-First Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam
FOR HEARING
For L C R
FOR HEARING
Call with MP
Call with MP
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 17-02-2026 | For L C R | |
| 02-02-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 14-01-2026 | Call with MP | |
| 04-12-2025 | Call with MP |
Interim Orders
Summary The petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone a 65-day delay in filing a criminal appeal was allowed. The Sessions Court accepted the petitioner's explanation that his clerk fell ill and failed to pursue the certified copy application, causing the original application to lapse, and found the delay justified in the interest of justice and merit-based disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone a 65-day delay in filing a criminal appeal was allowed. The Sessions Court accepted the petitioner's explanation that his clerk fell ill and failed to pursue the certified copy application, causing the original application to lapse, and found the delay justified in the interest of justice and merit-based disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
More from this court
District and Sessions Court/Rent Control Appellate Authority, Ernakulam All courts →Explore other courts