Anoop Kumar P vs Anu P Sasi Advocate - SADHANA KUMARI ESWARI, SADHANA KUMARI ESWARI, SADHANA KUMARI ESWARIAKHIL SOMAN, — 694/2025

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 29. Status: FOR HEARING. Next hearing: 23rd May 2026.

Crl.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: KLER010122622025

FOR HEARING

Next Hearing

23rd May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

5144/2025

Filing Date

02-12-2025

Registration No

694/2025

Registration Date

03-12-2025

Court

District and Sessions Court/Rent Control Appellate Authority, Ernakulam

Judge

2-First Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 29
Crl.MP/5927/2025 Classification : Delay Condonation Application Section Anoop Kumar PAnu P Sasi
Crl.MP/5928/2025 Classification : Petition Section Anoop Kumar PAnu P Sasi

Petitioner(s)

Anoop Kumar P

Adv. SHAJNA MULLATH

Respondent(s)

Anu P Sasi Advocate - SADHANA KUMARI ESWARI, SADHANA KUMARI ESWARI, SADHANA KUMARI ESWARIAKHIL SOMAN,

Aswatha Anoop

Adv. SADHANA KUMARI ESWARI,SADHANA KUMARI ESWARI SADHANA KUMARI ESWARI AKHIL SOMAN

Ananandhitha Anoop

Adv. SADHANA KUMARI ESWARI,SADHANA KUMARI ESWARI SADHANA KUMARI ESWARI AKHIL SOMAN

STATE OF KERALA

Adv. SADHANA KUMARI ESWARI

Hearing History

Judge: 2-First Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

10-03-2026

FOR HEARING

17-02-2026

For L C R

02-02-2026

FOR HEARING

14-01-2026

Call with MP

04-12-2025

Call with MP

Interim Orders

14-01-2026
Order

Summary The petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone a 65-day delay in filing a criminal appeal was allowed. The Sessions Court accepted the petitioner's explanation that his clerk fell ill and failed to pursue the certified copy application, causing the original application to lapse, and found the delay justified in the interest of justice and merit-based disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone a 65-day delay in filing a criminal appeal was allowed. The Sessions Court accepted the petitioner's explanation that his clerk fell ill and failed to pursue the certified copy application, causing the original application to lapse, and found the delay justified in the interest of justice and merit-based disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Court/Rent Control Appellate Authority, Ernakulam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case