Anoop Kumar P vs Anu P Sasi Advocate - SADHANA KUMARI ESWARI, SADHANA KUMARI ESWARI, SADHANA KUMARI ESWARIAKHIL SOMAN, — 694/2025
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 29. Status: For Hearing. Next hearing: 23rd May 2026.
Crl.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: KLER010122622025
Filing Number
5144/2025
Filing Date
02-Dec-2025
Registration No
694/2025
Registration Date
03-Dec-2025
Court
District and Sessions Court/Rent Control Appellate Authority, Ernakulam
Judge
2-First Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam
Last updated 30-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Anoop Kumar P
Adv. SHAJNA MULLATH
Respondent(s)
-
1.Anu P Sasi Advocate - SADHANA KUMARI ESWARI, SADHANA KUMARI ESWARI, SADHANA KUMARI ESWARIAKHIL SOMAN,
-
2.Aswatha Anoop
Adv. SADHANA KUMARI ESWARI,SADHANA KUMARI ESWARI SADHANA KUMARI ESWARI AKHIL SOMAN
-
3.Ananandhitha Anoop
Adv. SADHANA KUMARI ESWARI,SADHANA KUMARI ESWARI SADHANA KUMARI ESWARI AKHIL SOMAN
-
4.STATE OF KERALA
Adv. SADHANA KUMARI ESWARI
Case History
-
23-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Mar-2026
For Hearing
First Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam
-
17-Feb-2026
For L C R
First Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam
-
02-Feb-2026
For Hearing
First Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam
-
14-Jan-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone a 65-day delay in filing a criminal appeal was allowed. The Sessions Court accepted the petitioner's explanation that his clerk fell ill and failed to pursue the certified copy application, causing the original application to lapse, and found the delay justified in the interest of justice and merit-based disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Jan-2026
Call with Mp
District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam
-
04-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 694/2025
Summary The petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone a 65-day delay in filing a criminal appeal was allowed. The Sessions Court accepted the petitioner's explanation that his clerk fell ill and failed to pursue the certified copy application, causing the original application to lapse, and found the delay justified in the interest of justice and merit-based disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts