State of Kerala (A.T.S.) vs Chaithanya @ Surya Advocate - THUSHAR NIRMAL SARATHY — 100349/2022

Case under Kerala Forest Act Section S.27(i)(d),(iv). Status: Trial in the list. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: KLER010027112022

Trial in the list

Next Hearing

18th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

101695/2022

Filing Date

12-04-2022

Registration No

100349/2022

Registration Date

20-04-2022

Court

District and Sessions Court/Rent Control Appellate Authority, Ernakulam

Judge

4-Seventh Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

FIR Details

FIR Number

47

Police Station

ATS

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Kerala Forest Act Section S.27(i)(d),(iv)
Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act Section S.20,38,39,40
Arms Act 1959 Section S.7R/w25(A)
IPC \ Section S.121,121(A), 450, 392,506 (ii) R/w 34
Crl.MP/1/2026 Classification : Bail Application Section Chaithanya @ SuryaState of Kerala (A.T.S.)
Crl.MP/2/2026 Classification : Petition Section State of Kerala (A.T.S.)Chaithanya @ Surya

Petitioner(s)

State of Kerala (A.T.S.)

Adv. Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

Chaithanya @ Surya Advocate - THUSHAR NIRMAL SARATHY

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Seventh Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

10-04-2026

Trial in the list

09-03-2026

For Examination of Witness

11-02-2026

Trial in the list

15-01-2026

Trial in the list

26-12-2025

For production of accused

Interim Orders

09-02-2026
Bail Bond

Summary: Bail granted to accused Chaithanya in a terrorism case (CPI Maoist charges). The court allowed the petition after finding the accused had been in custody for over 4 years and trial is unlikely to commence soon due to ongoing investigations in a connected case. Bail was granted subject to stringent conditions including a ₹50,000 bond with two sureties, mandatory court appearances, and prohibition from committing similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Bail granted to accused Chaithanya in a terrorism case (CPI Maoist charges). The court allowed the petition after finding the accused had been in custody for over 4 years and trial is unlikely to commence soon due to ongoing investigations in a connected case. Bail was granted subject to stringent conditions including a ₹50,000 bond with two sureties, mandatory court appearances, and prohibition from committing similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Court/Rent Control Appellate Authority, Ernakulam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case