Habeeb V P vs State Of Kerala — 100041/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O.43,R.1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 31st March 2026.

Case disposed

CMA - CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL

CNR: KLER010022702023

e-Filing Number

03-04-2023

Filing Number

101008/2023

Filing Date

01-Apr-2023

Registration No

100041/2023

Registration Date

03-Apr-2023

Court

District and Sessions Court/Rent Control Appellate Authority, Ernakulam

Judge

2-First Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

Decision Date

31-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O.43,R.1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Habeeb V P

    Adv. RETHEESH N

  2. 2.V P Ansar

    Adv. RETHEESH N

  3. 3.Ashraf

    Adv. RETHEESH N

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of Kerala

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    Judgement

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    First Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

  4. 21-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    First Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    First Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    First Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    First Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    First Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

  9. 05-Feb-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    First Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

  10. 27-Jan-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    First Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

  11. 20-Jan-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    First Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

  12. 12-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    First Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

  13. 13-Nov-2025

    For Hearing

    First Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

  14. 10-Oct-2025

    For Hearing

    First Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

  15. 08-Oct-2025

    For Hearing

    First Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

  16. 29-Sep-2025

    Call on

    First Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

  17. 02-Sep-2025

    For Hearing

    First Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

  18. 26-Jul-2025

    For Hearing

    First Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

  19. 21-Jun-2025

    For Hearing

    First Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

  20. 24-May-2025

    For L C R

    First Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

  21. 24-Feb-2025

    For Hearing

    First Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

  22. 15-Nov-2024

    For Hearing

    First Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

  23. 15-Jul-2024

    For Hearing

    First Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

  24. 13-Jun-2024

    For Hearing

    First Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

  25. 11-Apr-2024

    For Hearing

    First Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

  26. 11-Mar-2024

    For paper Publication

    First Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

  27. 08-Feb-2024

    For paper Publication

    First Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

  28. 22-Dec-2023

    OrderView PDF

  29. 22-Dec-2023

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The District Court of Ernakulam allowed a petition under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone a 54-day delay in filing an appeal. The court accepted the petitioners' reasons for delay—including their mother's hospitalization, one petitioner's viral fever, and another's employment-related absence—finding them reasonable and not willful negligence. The court prioritized considering the matter on merits rather than purely technical grounds, as per the object of the Limitation Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  30. 22-Dec-2023

    Call with IA

    District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

  31. 20-Dec-2023

    Call with IA

    District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

  32. 08-Nov-2023

    Call with IA

    District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

  33. 28-Sep-2023

    Call with IA

    District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

  34. 14-Aug-2023

    Call with IA

    District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

  35. 24-Jul-2023

    Call with IA

    District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

  36. 17-Jun-2023

    Call with IA

    District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

  37. 09-Jun-2023

    Call with IA

    District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

  38. 05-Apr-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  39. 01-Apr-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100041/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District Court of Ernakulam allowed a petition under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone a 54-day delay in filing an appeal. The court accepted the petitioners' reasons for delay—including their mother's hospitalization, one petitioner's viral fever, and another's employment-related absence—finding them reasonable and not willful negligence. The court prioritized considering the matter on merits rather than purely technical grounds, as per the object of the Limitation Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case