Babu K K vs Surendran Advocate - VIVEK — 2/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER XLIII Rule 1(r). Status: FOR HEARING. Next hearing: 20th May 2026.

CMA - CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL

CNR: KLER010000382026

FOR HEARING

Next Hearing

20th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

2/2026

Filing Date

01-01-2026

Registration No

2/2026

Registration Date

05-01-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court/Rent Control Appellate Authority, Ernakulam

Judge

3-Second Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section ORDER XLIII Rule 1(r)
IA/1/2026 Classification : Injunction Application Section Babu K KSurendran
IA/2/2026 Classification : Petition Section SurendranBabu K K

Petitioner(s)

Babu K K

Adv. C.VARGHESE KURIAKOSE

Respondent(s)

Surendran Advocate - VIVEK

Leela

Adv. VIVEK,PAUL T SAMUEL

Charudathan

Adv. VIVEK,PAUL T SAMUEL

Chitra

Adv. VIVEK,PAUL T SAMUEL

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Second Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ernakulam

17-03-2026

FOR HEARING

10-03-2026

Adjourned

28-02-2026

For Objection and hearing

09-01-2026

Return of notice

Interim Orders

09-01-2026
Order

Summary: The District Court of Ernakulam granted an interim (temporary) injunction restraining the four respondents from trespassing onto the petitioner's scheduled property, using it for any purpose, or committing acts of waste thereon until 28 February 2026. The court found the petitioner had established a prima facie case and that issuing prior notice would defeat the petition's purpose due to delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District Court of Ernakulam granted an interim (temporary) injunction restraining the four respondents from trespassing onto the petitioner's scheduled property, using it for any purpose, or committing acts of waste thereon until 28 February 2026. The court found the petitioner had established a prima facie case and that issuing prior notice would defeat the petition's purpose due to delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court/Rent Control Appellate Authority, Ernakulam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case