State of Kerala Police vs Shinoj Advocate - JAYAKRISHNAN. T, JAYAKRISHNAN. T, JAYAKRISHNAN. TNALINI B, — 101453/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 74,75(1)(i). Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED U/S 258 BNSS on 17th March 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLAL390002762024
Filing Number
100139/2024
Filing Date
29-11-2024
Registration No
101453/2024
Registration Date
30-12-2024
Court
Fast Track Special Court, Haripad.
Judge
1-Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CONVICTED U/S 258 BNSS
FIR Details
FIR Number
1068
Police Station
Mavelikara Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala Police
Adv. Special Public Prosecutor,Haripad
Respondent(s)
Shinoj Advocate - JAYAKRISHNAN. T, JAYAKRISHNAN. T, JAYAKRISHNAN. TNALINI B,
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
Order/Judgement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 12-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 10-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 06-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Fast Track Special Court in Haripad convicted Shinoj of sexually assaulting a 17-year-old girl under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO), and SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act. The court rejected the accused's defense that he was falsely implicated due to a misunderstanding about information regarding the victim's brother's de-addiction treatment, finding the victim's testimony credible and the prosecution evidence sufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Fast Track Special Court in Haripad convicted Shinoj of sexually assaulting a 17-year-old girl under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO), and SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act. The court rejected the accused's defense that he was falsely implicated due to a misunderstanding about information regarding the victim's brother's de-addiction treatment, finding the victim's testimony credible and the prosecution evidence sufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts