State of Kerala Police vs Adarshkumar @ Unni Advocate - Krishnakumar.V — 100317/2023
Case under Ipc \ Section 363,354D(ii)34. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 30th April 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLAL390001292023
Filing Number
100065/2023
Filing Date
08-05-2023
Registration No
100317/2023
Registration Date
11-08-2023
Court
Fast Track Special Court, Haripad.
Judge
1-Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
58
Police Station
Kanakakunnu Police Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala Police
Adv. Special Public Prosecutor,Haripad
Respondent(s)
Adarshkumar @ Unni Advocate - Krishnakumar.V
Yadukrishnan
Adv. Krishnakumar.V.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
for evidence.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 29-04-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 27-04-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 23-04-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 22-04-2026 | for evidence. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Fast Track Special Court, Haripad acquitted both accused (Adarshkumar @ Unni and Yadhukrishnan) of charges under IPC Sections 363 and 354-D(2), PoCSO Act Sections 12 and 11(iv), and Juvenile Justice Act Section 84 for allegedly kidnapping a 16-year-old girl. The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, primarily because the victim (PW1) turned hostile and testified that the first accused is her husband, contradicting the kidnapping allegations and undermining the entire prosecution case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Fast Track Special Court, Haripad acquitted both accused (Adarshkumar @ Unni and Yadhukrishnan) of charges under IPC Sections 363 and 354-D(2), PoCSO Act Sections 12 and 11(iv), and Juvenile Justice Act Section 84 for allegedly kidnapping a 16-year-old girl. The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, primarily because the victim (PW1) turned hostile and testified that the first accused is her husband, contradicting the kidnapping allegations and undermining the entire prosecution case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts