State of Kerala Police vs Rahul @ Ammini Advocate - Adv.Ajayaghosh, Adv.Ajayaghosh — 100491/2024
Case under Ipc \ Section 363,328,r.w.34. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLAL390000942024
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
100048/2024
Filing Date
08-05-2024
Registration No
100491/2024
Registration Date
14-05-2024
Court
Fast Track Special Court, Haripad.
Judge
1-Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
FIR Details
FIR Number
834
Police Station
Kayamkulam Police Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala Police
Adv. Special Public Prosecutor,Haripad
Respondent(s)
Rahul @ Ammini Advocate - Adv.Ajayaghosh, Adv.Ajayaghosh
Rajesh
Adv. SIVAPRASAD B,SHEMIL KRISHNAKUMAR. V
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
Defence Evidence
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 08-04-2026 | Order/ Judgement | |
| 04-04-2026 | Order/ Judgement | |
| 30-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement | |
| 26-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Fast Track Special Judge, Haripad dismissed an application under Section 348 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, filed by accused Rajesh's counsel seeking recall of the primary witness (PW1) for further cross-examination in a kidnapping and intoxication case. The court found the application lacked sufficient grounds, noting that the petitioner had adequate opportunity to cross-examine PW1 during her testimony on 04/12/2025 but failed to do so effectively, and provided no valid reasons for recall. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Order
Summary: The Fast Track Special Judge, Haripad dismissed an application under Section 348 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, filed by accused Rajesh's counsel seeking recall of the primary witness (PW1) for further cross-examination in a kidnapping and intoxication case. The court found the application lacked sufficient grounds, noting that the petitioner had adequate opportunity to cross-examine PW1 during her testimony on 04/12/2025 but failed to do so effectively, and provided no valid reasons for recall. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts