State of Kerala Police vs Arunan Advocate - Muhammed Thaha K, Muhammed Thaha K — 868/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 332(c).74, 75(1)(i),75(1)(iv), 78. Status: Issue Bailable Warrant. Next hearing: 20th May 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLAL390000782025
Filing Number
2513/2025
Filing Date
12-Aug-2025
Registration No
868/2025
Registration Date
12-Aug-2025
Court
Fast Track Special Court, Haripad.
Judge
1-Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
Last updated 12-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
367
Police Station
Kanakakunnu Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Kerala Police
Adv. Asst.Public Prosecutor Alappuzha
Respondent(s)
-
1.Arunan Advocate - Muhammed Thaha K, Muhammed Thaha K
Case History
-
20-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-May-2026
Issue Bailable Warrant
Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
-
28-Apr-2026
Issue Bailable Warrant
Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
-
21-Apr-2026
call on
Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
-
13-Apr-2026
call on
Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
-
07-Apr-2026
call on
Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
-
27-Mar-2026
call on
Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
-
23-Mar-2026
call on
Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
-
17-Mar-2026
call on
Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
-
11-Mar-2026
call on
Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
-
04-Mar-2026
call on
Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
-
24-Feb-2026
Issue Bailable Warrant
Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
-
17-Feb-2026
OrderView PDF
Court Order Summary Case: CRL.M.P. No.1/2026 in S.C No.868/2025, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad Date: February 17, 2026 The accused's application for discharge under Section 250 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 was dismissed. The court found sufficient prima facie material to frame charges against the 62-year-old accused for alleged sexual assault of a 16-year-old minor victim with intellectual disability on May 21-22, 2025, under IPC sections and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. The court rejected arguments that lack of forensic evidence warranted discharge, holding that conviction can be based on reliable victim testimony and available medical evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Feb-2026
For framing charge
Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
-
16-Feb-2026
call on
Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
-
10-Feb-2026
call on
Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
-
07-Feb-2026
call on
Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
-
04-Feb-2026
call on
Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
-
28-Jan-2026
call on
Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
-
08-Jan-2026
For framing charge
Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
-
19-Dec-2025
call on
Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
-
10-Dec-2025
call on
Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
-
06-Dec-2025
For Hearing
Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
-
28-Nov-2025
call on
Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
-
26-Nov-2025
For framing charge
Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
-
14-Nov-2025
For Hearing
Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
-
31-Oct-2025
For Hearing
Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
-
24-Oct-2025
OrderView PDF
-
24-Oct-2025
call on
Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
-
23-Oct-2025
Orders in IA
Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
-
17-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 868/2025
Court Order Summary Case: CRL.M.P. No.1/2026 in S.C No.868/2025, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad Date: February 17, 2026 The accused's application for discharge under Section 250 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 was dismissed. The court found sufficient prima facie material to frame charges against the 62-year-old accused for alleged sexual assault of a 16-year-old minor victim with intellectual disability on May 21-22, 2025, under IPC sections and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. The court rejected arguments that lack of forensic evidence warranted discharge, holding that conviction can be based on reliable victim testimony and available medical evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts