State of Kerala Police vs Vishnudev Advocate - Shemil, Shemil — 101206/2022
Case under Ipc \ Section 363,366A,212,376(2)(n),34. Status: FOR HEARING. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLAL390000542025
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
43/2025
Filing Date
31-12-2022
Registration No
101206/2022
Registration Date
02-06-2025
Court
Fast Track Special Court, Haripad.
Judge
1-Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
FIR Details
FIR Number
373
Police Station
Ambalapuzha Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala Police
Adv. Special Public Prosecutor,Haripad
Respondent(s)
Vishnudev Advocate - Shemil, Shemil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
FOR HEARING
Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC
Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC
Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC
Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 13-04-2026 | Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC | |
| 01-04-2026 | Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC | |
| 27-03-2026 | Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC | |
| 23-03-2026 | Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC |
Interim Orders
Summary The Fast Track Special Court, Haripad dismissed the bail application filed by accused Vishnu Dev, charged with offenses under IPC sections 363, 366-A, 212, 376(2)(n) and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act. The court found that the accused had previously absconded twice despite being released on bail, demonstrating a pattern of non-cooperation with trial proceedings, and concluded there was a strong apprehension he would flee again if released, especially given the serious nature of the allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Fast Track Special Court, Haripad dismissed the bail application filed by accused Vishnu Dev, charged with offenses under IPC sections 363, 366-A, 212, 376(2)(n) and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act. The court found that the accused had previously absconded twice despite being released on bail, demonstrating a pattern of non-cooperation with trial proceedings, and concluded there was a strong apprehension he would flee again if released, especially given the serious nature of the allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts