State of Kerala Police vs Anilkumar — 100334/2025
Case under Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Section 7r/w8. Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 258 BNSS on 31st March 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLAL390000352025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
24/2025
Filing Date
12-03-2025
Registration No
100334/2025
Registration Date
12-03-2025
Court
Fast Track Special Court, Haripad.
Judge
1-Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
Decision Date
31st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 258 BNSS
FIR Details
FIR Number
853
Police Station
Kanakakunnu Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala Police
Respondent(s)
Anilkumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Haripad
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Order/Judgement
Defence Evidence
For hearing under section 255 BNSS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 31-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 28-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement | |
| 26-03-2026 | Order/Judgement | |
| 25-03-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 24-03-2026 | For hearing under section 255 BNSS |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Fast Track Special Court in Haripad acquitted Anilkumar of charges under Sections 333 & 75(1)(i) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 8 read with 7 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt because the victim (PW1) and her mother (PW2) did not support the prosecution case in court—the victim testified that the accused only touched her shoulder without committing any assault, contradicting the original allegations. Consequently, the accused was acquitted and released immediately with bail bond cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Fast Track Special Court in Haripad acquitted Anilkumar of charges under Sections 333 & 75(1)(i) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 8 read with 7 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt because the victim (PW1) and her mother (PW2) did not support the prosecution case in court—the victim testified that the accused only touched her shoulder without committing any assault, contradicting the original allegations. Consequently, the accused was acquitted and released immediately with bail bond cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts