STATE OF KERALA POLICE vs RINOJ Advocate - SREEKUMAR K — 923/2017

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,294(b),506(1). Disposed: Uncontested--Acquitted U/s. 255-1 Cr.Pc on 23rd March 2026.

ST - SUMMARY TRIAL

CNR: KLAL380009372017

Case disposed

Filing Number

976/2017

Filing Date

31-12-2017

Registration No

923/2017

Registration Date

31-12-2017

Court

Gram Nyayalaya, Ambalappuzha

Judge

1-Nyayadhikari , Gram Nyayalaya

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Acquitted U/s. 255-1 Cr.Pc

FIR Details

FIR Number

1813

Police Station

Ambalapuzha Police Station

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,294(b),506(1)
Crl.mp(ab)/1/2026 Classification : Absent Petition Section RINOJ

Petitioner(s)

STATE OF KERALA POLICE

Adv. Asst. Public Prosecutor, Gram Nyayalaya Ambalappuzha

Respondent(s)

RINOJ Advocate - SREEKUMAR K

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Nyayadhikari , Gram Nyayalaya

23-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

Order/ Judgement

10-03-2026

FOR HEARING

03-03-2026

For evidence

17-02-2026

for evidence.

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
Judgement

The court acquitted the accused Rinoj (40 years old) under IPC sections 323, 294(b), and 506(1) after finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges. The prosecution's witnesses, including the complainant (PW1), testified that no injury was sustained and failed to establish that the accused committed the alleged assault, abusive language, and threats. The court concluded that the prosecution failed to prove the guilt beyond reasonable doubt and accordingly discharged the accused under CrPC section 255(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the accused Rinoj (40 years old) under IPC sections 323, 294(b), and 506(1) after finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges. The prosecution's witnesses, including the complainant (PW1), testified that no injury was sustained and failed to establish that the accused committed the alleged assault, abusive language, and threats. The court concluded that the prosecution failed to prove the guilt beyond reasonable doubt and accordingly discharged the accused under CrPC section 255(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Gram Nyayalaya, Ambalappuzha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case