State of Kerala Police vs Juby — 100428/2022
Case under Ipc \ Section 143,147,149,294(b),323,506(i), 341. Disposed: Uncontested--Acquitted U/s. 255-1 Cr.Pc on 26th March 2026.
ST - SUMMARY TRIAL
CNR: KLAL380004912022
Filing Number
100483/2022
Filing Date
21-10-2022
Registration No
100428/2022
Registration Date
21-10-2022
Court
Gram Nyayalaya, Ambalappuzha
Judge
1-Nyayadhikari , Gram Nyayalaya
Decision Date
26th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Acquitted U/s. 255-1 Cr.Pc
FIR Details
FIR Number
375
Police Station
Ambalapuzha Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala Police
Adv. Asst.Public Prosecutor Alappuzha
Respondent(s)
Juby
Jaya Raj
Saji Mon
Judy
Jayesh @ Baby
Sudershanan
Reji Mahesh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Nyayadhikari , Gram Nyayalaya
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
FOR HEARING
for evidence.
Issue bailable warrant to witness
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 12-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 19-02-2026 | for evidence. |
| 16-01-2026 | Issue bailable warrant to witness |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Gram Nyayalaya (Village Court) in Ambalappuzha acquitted all seven defendants (accused persons 1-7) under IPC Sections 143, 147, 149, 294(b), 323, 506(1), and 341 on 26 March 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the charges through credible witness testimony—the prosecution witnesses either did not directly witness the alleged incident or provided contradictory statements, leaving reasonable doubt about the defendants' guilt. Consequently, the defendants were discharged under CrPC Section 255(1) and released unconditionally, with their bail bonds cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Gram Nyayalaya (Village Court) in Ambalappuzha acquitted all seven defendants (accused persons 1-7) under IPC Sections 143, 147, 149, 294(b), 323, 506(1), and 341 on 26 March 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the charges through credible witness testimony—the prosecution witnesses either did not directly witness the alleged incident or provided contradictory statements, leaving reasonable doubt about the defendants' guilt. Consequently, the defendants were discharged under CrPC Section 255(1) and released unconditionally, with their bail bonds cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts