Hansa Fathima vs Sajid. M. Shamsudeen — 100017/2022
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 28th March 2026.
MC - MISCELLANEOUS CASE
CNR: KLAL380001202022
Filing Number
100118/2022
Filing Date
21-03-2022
Registration No
100017/2022
Registration Date
21-03-2022
Court
Gram Nyayalaya, Ambalappuzha
Judge
1-Nyayadhikari , Gram Nyayalaya
Decision Date
28th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Hansa Fathima
Adv. NAJEEB. K
Respondent(s)
Sajid. M. Shamsudeen
Shamsudeen M K
Nazeema Beevi. P H
Aneesh. P. Salim
Sajitha
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Nyayadhikari , Gram Nyayalaya
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
Order/ Judgement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 07-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 28-02-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 26-02-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted a woman's petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, finding her and her minor daughter suffered mental, physical, and financial abuse from her husband and in-laws following their 2021 marriage. The court issued a protection order prohibiting domestic violence, ordered the husband to pay ₹15,000 monthly maintenance to the wife and ₹5,000 for the child, but rejected claims for ₹65,000 delivery costs and ₹25 lakh compensation due to insufficient evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court granted a woman's petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, finding her and her minor daughter suffered mental, physical, and financial abuse from her husband and in-laws following their 2021 marriage. The court issued a protection order prohibiting domestic violence, ordered the husband to pay ₹15,000 monthly maintenance to the wife and ₹5,000 for the child, but rejected claims for ₹65,000 delivery costs and ₹25 lakh compensation due to insufficient evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts