State of Kerala Police vs Rajesh Advocate - ANU G. THOTTAPPALLY — 100069/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,149,323,353,427. Disposed: Uncontested--Acquitted U/s. 255-1 Cr.Pc on 26th March 2026.
ST - SUMMARY TRIAL
CNR: KLAL380000162018
Filing Number
100069/2018
Filing Date
31-01-2018
Registration No
100069/2018
Registration Date
01-02-2018
Court
Gram Nyayalaya, Ambalappuzha
Judge
1-Nyayadhikari , Gram Nyayalaya
Decision Date
26th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Acquitted U/s. 255-1 Cr.Pc
FIR Details
FIR Number
783
Police Station
Ambalapuzha Police Station
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala Police
Adv. Asst.Public Prosecutor ,Gram Nyayalaya,ambalappuzha
Respondent(s)
Rajesh Advocate - ANU G. THOTTAPPALLY
Balan
Adv. ANU G. THOTTAPPALLY
Madhu M T
Adv. ANU G. THOTTAPPALLY
Nigi P P
Adv. ANU G. THOTTAPPALLY
Sabu
Adv. ANU G. THOTTAPPALLY
Rajeevan
Adv. ANU G. THOTTAPPALLY
Vijayan
Adv. ANU G. THOTTAPPALLY
Jinesh
Adv. ANU G. THOTTAPPALLY
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Nyayadhikari , Gram Nyayalaya
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
FOR HEARING
For evidence
For evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 16-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 03-03-2026 | For evidence |
| 24-02-2026 | For evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: ST No. 69/2018 Court Decision: The Gram Nyayalaya, Ambalappuzha acquitted all eight accused under IPC Sections 143, 147, 149, 323, 353, and 427, finding the prosecution failed to prove charges beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Despite evidence of a protest and property damage (₹3,000) at a beverage outlet on June 24, 2017, critical witness testimony was insufficient. The complainant (PW1) could not identify the accused before the court, admitted ignorance of who led the protest, and provided no details of the violent acts. Other eyewitnesses (PW3, PW4) stated they didn't actually witness the incident, while PW2 also couldn't identify the accused. Without credible identification and eyewitness testimony connecting specific individuals to the unlawful assembly and violent acts, the court found the charges unproven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: ST No. 69/2018 Court Decision: The Gram Nyayalaya, Ambalappuzha acquitted all eight accused under IPC Sections 143, 147, 149, 323, 353, and 427, finding the prosecution failed to prove charges beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Despite evidence of a protest and property damage (₹3,000) at a beverage outlet on June 24, 2017, critical witness testimony was insufficient. The complainant (PW1) could not identify the accused before the court, admitted ignorance of who led the protest, and provided no details of the violent acts. Other eyewitnesses (PW3, PW4) stated they didn't actually witness the incident, while PW2 also couldn't identify the accused. Without credible identification and eyewitness testimony connecting specific individuals to the unlawful assembly and violent acts, the court found the charges unproven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts