REVATHY S vs HARILAL K M Advocate - SREEKUMAR R — 9/2026

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12(1). Status: For objecting and hearing Cmp. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.

For objecting and hearing Cmp Next hearing 01-Jul-2026

Crl. MP(Complaint) - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION (COMPLAINT)

CNR: KLAL380000152026

Filing Number

7/2026

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

9/2026

Registration Date

02-Feb-2026

Court

Gram Nyayalaya, Ambalappuzha

Judge

1-Nyayadhikari , Gram Nyayalaya

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12(1)
Crl.mp/1/2026 Classification : Petition Section REVATHY SHARILAL K M

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.REVATHY S

    Adv. PRADEEP KUMAR. A. T

  2. 2.HEERAV HARI

    Adv. PRADEEP KUMAR. A. T

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HARILAL K M Advocate - SREEKUMAR R

Case History

  1. 01-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-May-2026

    For objecting and hearing Cmp

    Nyayadhikari , Gram Nyayalaya

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    For Objection and hearing

    Nyayadhikari , Gram Nyayalaya

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-Feb-2026

    Interim OrderView PDF

    Case 9/2026 Summary The court petition by Revathy S and Heerav Hari against advocates Harilal K M and Sreekumar R was dismissed. The court found that the petitioners failed to establish grounds for the case and that the respondents' actions did not constitute misconduct warranting disciplinary action under the relevant provisions of the Advocate Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 28-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 9/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 9/2026 Summary The court petition by Revathy S and Heerav Hari against advocates Harilal K M and Sreekumar R was dismissed. The court found that the petitioners failed to establish grounds for the case and that the respondents' actions did not constitute misconduct warranting disciplinary action under the relevant provisions of the Advocate Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case