State of Kerala Police vs Sudheesh Advocate - NISHA MOL. S — 100050/2021
Case under Ipc \ Section 279,304(a). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.
ST - SUMMARY TRIAL
CNR: KLAL370000512021
Filing Number
100050/2021
Filing Date
20-01-2021
Registration No
100050/2021
Registration Date
20-01-2021
Court
Gram Nyayalaya, Kanjikuzhi
Judge
1-Nyayadhikari,Gram Nyayalaya-Kanjikuzhi
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
1123
Police Station
Mararikulam Police Station
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala Police
Adv. Asst. Public Prosecutor, Gramnyayalaya Kanjikuzhy
Respondent(s)
Sudheesh Advocate - NISHA MOL. S
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Nyayadhikari,Gram Nyayalaya-Kanjikuzhi
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Defence Evidence
Repeat Summons
Memo to SHO
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 21-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 11-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 18-02-2026 | Repeat Summons |
| 03-02-2026 | Memo to SHO |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Gram Nyayalaya (Village Court), Kannikuzhi acquitted defendant Sudhish under IPC Sections 279 and 304A (rash driving and death by negligence) on March 24, 2026. The court found insufficient evidence to establish that the defendant was driving the vehicle involved in a fatal collision that killed the witness's brother; the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant was the driver at the time of the accident, despite circumstantial evidence of the incident itself. The defendant was discharged under CrPC Section 278(1) and released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Gram Nyayalaya (Village Court), Kannikuzhi acquitted defendant Sudhish under IPC Sections 279 and 304A (rash driving and death by negligence) on March 24, 2026. The court found insufficient evidence to establish that the defendant was driving the vehicle involved in a fatal collision that killed the witness's brother; the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant was the driver at the time of the accident, despite circumstantial evidence of the incident itself. The defendant was discharged under CrPC Section 278(1) and released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts