State of Kerala Police vs SURESH BABU Advocate - APPACHANKUTTY M M — 100510/2022
Case under Penal Code, 1860 Section 294(b),427,341,324,323. Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED on 28th March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLAL320022332022
e-Filing Number
21-12-2022
Filing Number
102215/2022
Filing Date
21-Dec-2022
Registration No
100510/2022
Registration Date
21-Dec-2022
Court
JFCM Ramankary
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
Decision Date
28-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--AQUITTED
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
347
Police Station
Kainady Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Kerala Police
Adv. Asst. Public Prosecutor, Ramankari
Respondent(s)
-
1.SURESH BABU Advocate - APPACHANKUTTY M M
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
27-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: CC.No. 510/2022 Court Decision: Suresh Babu was acquitted of all charges under IPC sections 294(b), 324, 323, 341, and 427 and set at liberty. Key Reasoning: The court found the prosecution's case fatally weak due to: (1) failure to produce the primary informant (Subhash) despite multiple opportunities and coercive steps; (2) an eyewitness turning hostile by denying witnessing the incident; (3) medical evidence alone being insufficient—the doctor testified injuries could result from falls and pain could be feigned; (4) no independent witness corroborating the alleged assault and property damage of ₹15,000; and (5) the circumstantial nature of remaining evidence. The accused was entitled to benefit of reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
Order/ Judgement
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
24-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
18-Mar-2026
Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
16-Feb-2026
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
08-Jan-2026
Issue NBW
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
03-Dec-2025
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
13-Oct-2025
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
09-Sep-2025
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
06-Aug-2025
NBW to cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
02-Aug-2025
NBW to cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
28-Jul-2025
NBW to cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
30-Jun-2025
Issue Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
11-Jun-2025
BW to cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
05-Jun-2025
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
23-Apr-2025
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
03-Apr-2025
Memo to SHO
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
13-Mar-2025
BW to cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
21-Feb-2025
BW to cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
11-Feb-2025
BW to cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
22-Jan-2025
Issue NBW
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
08-Jan-2025
BW to cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
17-Dec-2024
BW to cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
05-Dec-2024
BW to cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
22-Nov-2024
Issue bailable warrant to witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
28-Oct-2024
Issue Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
08-Oct-2024
Bound over
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
24-Sep-2024
Issue bailable warrant to witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
03-Sep-2024
Issue Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
13-Aug-2024
Appearance of Accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
24-Jul-2024
Memo to SHO
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
05-Jul-2024
Issue bailable warrant to witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
19-Jun-2024
Bound over
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
28-May-2024
Issue bailable warrant to witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
30-Apr-2024
Call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
08-Apr-2024
BW to cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
13-Mar-2024
BW to cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
31-Jan-2024
Issue bailable warrant to witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
10-Jan-2024
Memo to SHO
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
15-Dec-2023
Return of summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
06-Dec-2023
Issue Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
15-Nov-2023
For framing charge
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
21-Oct-2023
Hearing on Charge
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
06-Oct-2023
Hearing on Charge
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
18-Sep-2023
Hearing on Charge
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
11-Sep-2023
repeat NBW
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
21-Aug-2023
Issue Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
03-Aug-2023
Memo to SHO
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
29-Jun-2023
Declared Holidays
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
02-Jun-2023
No sitting notified
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
03-May-2023
Repeat Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
20-Mar-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Dec-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 100510/2022
Case Summary: CC.No. 510/2022 Court Decision: Suresh Babu was acquitted of all charges under IPC sections 294(b), 324, 323, 341, and 427 and set at liberty. Key Reasoning: The court found the prosecution's case fatally weak due to: (1) failure to produce the primary informant (Subhash) despite multiple opportunities and coercive steps; (2) an eyewitness turning hostile by denying witnessing the incident; (3) medical evidence alone being insufficient—the doctor testified injuries could result from falls and pain could be feigned; (4) no independent witness corroborating the alleged assault and property damage of ₹15,000; and (5) the circumstantial nature of remaining evidence. The accused was entitled to benefit of reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts