State of Kerala Police vs Aneesh Advocate - Nithish R Pillai (K/2485/ — 100206/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,324,354,427. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 26th May 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLAL320009472024
Filing Number
100944/2024
Filing Date
17-Apr-2024
Registration No
100206/2024
Registration Date
17-Apr-2024
Court
JFCM Ramankary
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
Decision Date
26-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
803
Police Station
Nedumudy Police Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Kerala Police
Adv. Asst. Public Prosecutor, Ramankari
Respondent(s)
-
1.Aneesh Advocate - Nithish R Pillai (K/2485/
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-May-2026
Disposed
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
25-May-2026
Judgement
Case Summary: CC No. 206/2024 Decision: The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary acquitted Aneesh of all charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 324, 354, and 427 on May 26, 2026, finding him not guilty and ordering his immediate release. Key Reasoning: The court found the prosecution case fundamentally weak due to the complainant (PW1-Gopi) and witness (PW2-Vasumathi) turning hostile. PW1 testified he did not know the accused and had mistakenly given his name to police, while PW2 claimed she did not witness the alleged incident. The Assistant Public Prosecutor conceded that available materials were insufficient to establish guilt. The court concluded the prosecution "miserably failed" to prove the alleged offences of obscene words, voluntary hurt, hurt by weapon, criminal force to outrage modesty, and mischief causing Rs. 30,000 loss. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-May-2026
Order/ Judgement
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
19-May-2026
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
21-Apr-2026
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
18-Mar-2026
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
10-Feb-2026
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
01-Jan-2026
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
25-Nov-2025
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
21-Oct-2025
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
23-Sep-2025
No sitting notified
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
13-Aug-2025
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
03-Jul-2025
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
10-Jun-2025
For framing charge
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
05-May-2025
Appearance of Accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
15-Mar-2025
Hearing on Charge
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
03-Feb-2025
Hearing on Charge
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
12-Dec-2024
Hearing on Charge
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
27-Sep-2024
Hearing on Charge
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
07-Aug-2024
Hearing on Charge
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
20-Jun-2024
For Bail
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
-
03-Jun-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Apr-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 100206/2024
Case Summary: CC No. 206/2024 Decision: The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary acquitted Aneesh of all charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 324, 354, and 427 on May 26, 2026, finding him not guilty and ordering his immediate release. Key Reasoning: The court found the prosecution case fundamentally weak due to the complainant (PW1-Gopi) and witness (PW2-Vasumathi) turning hostile. PW1 testified he did not know the accused and had mistakenly given his name to police, while PW2 claimed she did not witness the alleged incident. The Assistant Public Prosecutor conceded that available materials were insufficient to establish guilt. The court concluded the prosecution "miserably failed" to prove the alleged offences of obscene words, voluntary hurt, hurt by weapon, criminal force to outrage modesty, and mischief causing Rs. 30,000 loss. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts