State of Kerala Police vs Bhagyesh Advocate - KISHORE KUMAR. R — 100161/2024
Case under Ipc \ Section 451,294(b),341,323,324,506(ii),34. Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED on 30th May 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLAL320007492024
Filing Number
100746/2024
Filing Date
19-03-2024
Registration No
100161/2024
Registration Date
19-03-2024
Court
JFCM Ramankary
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
Decision Date
30th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
61
Police Station
Ramankary Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala Police
Adv. Asst. Public Prosecutor, Ramankari
Respondent(s)
Bhagyesh Advocate - KISHORE KUMAR. R
Shylaja
Adv. KISHORE KUMAR. R
Bhavana
Adv. KISHORE KUMAR. R
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramankary
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 26-05-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 25-05-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 21-05-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 19-05-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: C.C.No. 161/2024 The court acquitted all three accused (Bhaghyesh, Bhavana, and Shylaja) of charges under IPC sections 451, 294(b), 341, 323, 324, and 506(ii) r/w 34, finding the prosecution failed to prove essential ingredients beyond reasonable doubt. Key weaknesses included material contradictions and omissions in witness testimony, a six-day delay in filing the FIR without explanation, medical evidence contradicting assault claims, and the disputes stemming from a family funeral dispute creating motive for false accusation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: C.C.No. 161/2024 The court acquitted all three accused (Bhaghyesh, Bhavana, and Shylaja) of charges under IPC sections 451, 294(b), 341, 323, 324, and 506(ii) r/w 34, finding the prosecution failed to prove essential ingredients beyond reasonable doubt. Key weaknesses included material contradictions and omissions in witness testimony, a six-day delay in filing the FIR without explanation, medical evidence contradicting assault claims, and the disputes stemming from a family funeral dispute creating motive for false accusation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts