Sree Sadgamaya Chits India vs Jeeva Raj. N — 200062/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Restor.Ptn - RESTORATION PETITION

CNR: KLAL290004462022

Filing Number

20510/2022

Filing Date

23-Nov-2022

Registration No

200062/2022

Registration Date

23-Nov-2022

Court

Munsiff Court, Chengannur

Judge

1-Munsiff, Chengannur

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sree Sadgamaya Chits India

    Adv. Gokul G Krishnan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jeeva Raj. N

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The Munsiff Court, Chengannur allowed the defendant Jeeva Raj's petition to set aside an ex parte decree dated 07/11/2019 and condone the 1081-day delay in filing the application. The court found that the defendant's failure to contest the suit was due to his counsel's negligence in not informing him about proceedings, rather than willful default, and that he had substantial contentions to raise on merits. The petitions were allowed conditionally, requiring the defendant to pay ₹2,000 costs to the Taluk Legal Services Authority within 10 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Verify and report

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  9. 29-Jan-2026

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  10. 19-Jan-2026

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  11. 16-Dec-2025

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  12. 04-Dec-2025

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  13. 10-Nov-2025

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  14. 15-Oct-2025

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  15. 22-Sep-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  16. 12-Aug-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  17. 16-Jul-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  18. 21-Jun-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  19. 29-May-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  20. 28-Mar-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  21. 12-Mar-2025

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  22. 25-Feb-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  23. 15-Feb-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  24. 29-Jan-2025

    for evidence.

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  25. 12-Nov-2024

    for evidence.

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  26. 23-Oct-2024

    for evidence.

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  27. 16-Oct-2024

    Objection

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  28. 30-Sep-2024

    Objection

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  29. 30-Aug-2024

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  30. 22-Aug-2024

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  31. 05-Jul-2024

    For Objection and hearing

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  32. 19-Jun-2024

    For Objection and hearing

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  33. 06-Apr-2024

    Objection

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  34. 11-Mar-2024

    Objection

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  35. 22-Feb-2024

    Objection

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  36. 30-Jan-2024

    Objection

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  37. 11-Jan-2024

    Objection

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  38. 08-Dec-2023

    Objection

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  39. 18-Nov-2023

    Objection

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  40. 30-Sep-2023

    Objection

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  41. 22-Aug-2023

    Objection

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  42. 26-Jul-2023

    Objection

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  43. 30-Jun-2023

    Objection

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  44. 31-May-2023

    Adjourned

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  45. 16-Mar-2023

    Return of notice

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  46. 23-Nov-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  47. 23-Nov-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200062/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Munsiff Court, Chengannur allowed the defendant Jeeva Raj's petition to set aside an ex parte decree dated 07/11/2019 and condone the 1081-day delay in filing the application. The court found that the defendant's failure to contest the suit was due to his counsel's negligence in not informing him about proceedings, rather than willful default, and that he had substantial contentions to raise on merits. The petitions were allowed conditionally, requiring the defendant to pay ₹2,000 costs to the Taluk Legal Services Authority within 10 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case