GEEVARGHESE GEORGE @ G George vs Jacob George Advocate - JOSE P O — 234/2025

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section Sn 26 Order 7 Rule 1 an 3. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.

Written Statement Next hearing 13-Jul-2026

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLAL290004382025

Filing Number

421/2025

Filing Date

05-Nov-2025

Registration No

234/2025

Registration Date

05-Nov-2025

Court

Munsiff Court, Chengannur

Judge

1-Munsiff, Chengannur

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section Sn 26 Order 7 Rule 1 an 3
Ia/1/2025 Classification : Injunction Application Section GEEVARGHESE GEORGE @ G GeorgeJacob George
Ia/2/2025 Classification : Commission Application Section GEEVARGHESE GEORGE @ G GeorgeJacob George
Ia/3/2025 Classification : Sanction Petition Section GEEVARGHESE GEORGE @ G GeorgeJacob George
Ia/4/2025 Classification : Sanction Petition Section GEEVARGHESE GEORGE @ G GeorgeJacob George
Ia/5/2025 Classification : Application Seeking Permission to Produce Documents Section GEEVARGHESE GEORGE @ G GeorgeJacob George
Ia/1/2026 Classification : Petition to Accept Photocopy Section Jacob GeorgeGEEVARGHESE GEORGE @ G George
Ia/2/2026 Classification : Sanction Petition Section GEEVARGHESE GEORGE @ G GeorgeJacob George
Ia/3/2026 Classification : Petition to Accept Photocopy Section Jacob GeorgeGEEVARGHESE GEORGE @ G George
Ia/4/2026 Classification : Sanction Petition Section GEEVARGHESE GEORGE @ G GeorgeJacob George
Ia/5/2026 Classification : Carbon Copy Application Section Jacob GeorgeGEEVARGHESE GEORGE @ G George

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GEEVARGHESE GEORGE @ G George

    Adv. AJITHKUMAR P K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jacob George Advocate - JOSE P O

  2. 2.Sumana Jacob

    Adv. JOSE P O,JOSE P O

  3. 3.George Jacob

    Adv. JOSE P O,JOSE P O

Case History

  1. 13-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: OS No. 234/2025 Outcome: Temporary injunction PARTIALLY GRANTED in favor of petitioner Geevarghese George. The court restrained respondents from trespassing into or obstructing petitioner's peaceful residence in the residential house (Item No. 2), while directing both parties to maintain status quo regarding the disputed land property (Item No. 1) until trial, as the exact boundary remains contested. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Written Statement

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  4. 01-Jun-2026

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  5. 22-May-2026

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  6. 04-Apr-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  7. 28-Mar-2026

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  8. 21-Mar-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  9. 18-Mar-2026

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  10. 06-Mar-2026

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  11. 10-Feb-2026

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  12. 23-Jan-2026

    For further hearing

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  13. 17-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  14. 15-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  15. 14-Jan-2026

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  16. 13-Jan-2026

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  17. 12-Jan-2026

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  18. 16-Dec-2025

    For further hearing

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  19. 10-Dec-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  20. 06-Dec-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  21. 05-Dec-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  22. 05-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 05-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 234/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS No. 234/2025 Outcome: Temporary injunction PARTIALLY GRANTED in favor of petitioner Geevarghese George. The court restrained respondents from trespassing into or obstructing petitioner's peaceful residence in the residential house (Item No. 2), while directing both parties to maintain status quo regarding the disputed land property (Item No. 1) until trial, as the exact boundary remains contested. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case