Alexandar C.M vs Iypu. V.E — 200090/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26,. Status: Report on mediation. Next hearing: 21st May 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLAL290001762022
Next Hearing
21st May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
20197/2022
Filing Date
18-05-2022
Registration No
200090/2022
Registration Date
18-05-2022
Court
Munsiff Court, Chengannur
Judge
1-Munsiff, Chengannur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Alexandar C.M
Adv. RAJESHKUMAR. K. R
Mathew .C.M
Respondent(s)
Iypu. V.E
Rosamma Iypu
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff, Chengannur
Report on mediation
For settlement
For settlement
For settlement
For settlement
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Report on mediation | |
| 09-03-2026 | For settlement | |
| 12-02-2026 | For settlement | |
| 04-02-2026 | For settlement | |
| 06-01-2026 | For settlement |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Munsiff Court, Chengannur allowed the review petition filed by defendant Iype V.E. on 16 August 2025. The court reviewed and set aside the order dated 04.08.2025 that had dismissed two interlocutory applications (IA No. 3/2025 and IA No. 4/2025) on grounds of non-readiness, accepting that the petitioner's counsel's absence was due to genuine traffic obstruction and constituted sufficient cause. The dismissed applications seeking case removal and commissioner appointment have been restored to file for fresh consideration on merits, with no order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Munsiff Court, Chengannur allowed the review petition filed by defendant Iype V.E. on 16 August 2025. The court reviewed and set aside the order dated 04.08.2025 that had dismissed two interlocutory applications (IA No. 3/2025 and IA No. 4/2025) on grounds of non-readiness, accepting that the petitioner's counsel's absence was due to genuine traffic obstruction and constituted sufficient cause. The dismissed applications seeking case removal and commissioner appointment have been restored to file for fresh consideration on merits, with no order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts