V.C Sakariya vs Karthika — 200092/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 31st March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLAL290001592020
Filing Number
200179/2020
Filing Date
01-06-2020
Registration No
200092/2020
Registration Date
01-06-2020
Court
Munsiff Court, Chengannur
Judge
1-Munsiff, Chengannur
Decision Date
31st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
V.C Sakariya
Adv. ROY PHILIP
Respondent(s)
Karthika
Gopi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff, Chengannur
Disposed
Orders in IA
Orders in IA
FOR HEARING
Objection
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 31-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | Orders in IA |
| 24-03-2026 | Orders in IA |
| 23-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 11-03-2026 | Objection |
Interim Orders
The Munsiff Court of Chengannur decreed the plaintiff's suit for mandatory and prohibitory injunction against the defendants. The court found that the plaintiff holds easement rights by prescription over a 4-foot-wide pathway and that the defendants unlawfully obstructed it by planting trees. The court directed the defendants to remove the obstructing trees within one month and permanently restrained them from further trespass, with costs awarded to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Munsiff Court of Chengannur decreed the plaintiff's suit for mandatory and prohibitory injunction against the defendants. The court found that the plaintiff holds easement rights by prescription over a 4-foot-wide pathway and that the defendants unlawfully obstructed it by planting trees. The court directed the defendants to remove the obstructing trees within one month and permanently restrained them from further trespass, with costs awarded to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts