Kunjupanickan vs Saji Sivasailam Advocate - VIJAYA SHANKAR — 200073/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Sn26Order7Rule1and2. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 27th July 2026.

Written Statement Next hearing 27-Jul-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLAL290001482025

e-Filing Number

29-03-2025

Filing Number

167/2025

Filing Date

29-Mar-2025

Registration No

200073/2025

Registration Date

29-Mar-2025

Court

Munsiff Court, Chengannur

Judge

1-Munsiff, Chengannur

Last updated 20-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Sn26Order7Rule1and2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kunjupanickan

    Adv. AJITHKUMAR P K

  2. 2.Valsala Valsamma

    Adv. AJITHKUMAR P K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Saji Sivasailam Advocate - VIJAYA SHANKAR

Case History

  1. 27-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  3. 23-Oct-2025

    Written Statement

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  4. 02-Aug-2025

    Written Statement

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  5. 30-May-2025

    Return of summons

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  6. 29-Mar-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Munsiff Court of Chengannur granted interim injunction in favor of plaintiffs Kunju Panicker and Valsamma against the five defendants in this property dispute case. The court found that the plaintiffs have established a prima facie case and that delaying notice to defendants would defeat the purpose of the injunction, therefore ordering interim relief to remain in effect until further orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 29-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 29-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200073/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Munsiff Court of Chengannur granted interim injunction in favor of plaintiffs Kunju Panicker and Valsamma against the five defendants in this property dispute case. The court found that the plaintiffs have established a prima facie case and that delaying notice to defendants would defeat the purpose of the injunction, therefore ordering interim relief to remain in effect until further orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case