Sheela K Abraham vs Prasad M Cherian Advocate - JOSEPH GEORGE — 200001/2023
Case under --- Section 11(2)band11(3). Status: Return of summons. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
RCP - RENT CONTROL PETITION
CNR: KLAL290001102023
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2023
Filing Number
200144/2023
Filing Date
10-03-2023
Registration No
200001/2023
Registration Date
10-03-2023
Court
Munsiff Court, Chengannur
Judge
1-Munsiff, Chengannur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sheela K Abraham
Adv. SURESH MATHAI VARGHESE
Respondent(s)
Prasad M Cherian Advocate - JOSEPH GEORGE
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff, Chengannur
Return of summons
Return of summons
For return of summons
Return of summons
for evidence.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Return of summons | |
| 01-04-2026 | Return of summons | |
| 18-03-2026 | For return of summons | |
| 09-03-2026 | Return of summons | |
| 06-03-2026 | for evidence. |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY The Rent Controller partially allowed the petition, ordering the respondent (tenant) to pay ₹26,250 (5 months of unpaid rent at ₹5,250/month for May 2021, July 2021, October 2021, August 2025, and September 2025) with 6% annual interest within one month. The court rejected the petitioner's claim of ₹3,62,250 in arrears, finding that the respondent had substantially paid rent via postal money orders as permitted under Kerala Rent Control Act Section 9(2), and the petitioner's refusal to accept payments since 2018 did not constitute default. The respondent must continue paying current rent until proceedings terminate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The Rent Controller partially allowed the petition, ordering the respondent (tenant) to pay ₹26,250 (5 months of unpaid rent at ₹5,250/month for May 2021, July 2021, October 2021, August 2025, and September 2025) with 6% annual interest within one month. The court rejected the petitioner's claim of ₹3,62,250 in arrears, finding that the respondent had substantially paid rent via postal money orders as permitted under Kerala Rent Control Act Section 9(2), and the petitioner's refusal to accept payments since 2018 did not constitute default. The respondent must continue paying current rent until proceedings terminate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts