Amalesh Sharma vs Omanakkuttan Advocate - SUDHEERKHAN. S — 200063/2019

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Return of notice. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Return of notice Next hearing 12-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLAL290000802019

Filing Number

200089/2019

Filing Date

08-Feb-2019

Registration No

200063/2019

Registration Date

08-Feb-2019

Court

Munsiff Court, Chengannur

Judge

1-Munsiff, Chengannur

Last updated 20-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Amalesh Sharma

    Adv. Ajayakumar. S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Omanakkuttan Advocate - SUDHEERKHAN. S

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Return of notice

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  3. 16-Jan-2026

    Return of notice

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  4. 04-Nov-2025

    Return of notice

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  5. 20-Sep-2025

    Return of notice

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  6. 31-Jul-2025

    Return of notice

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  7. 24-Jun-2025

    Return of notice

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  8. 19-May-2025

    Return of notice

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  9. 04-Mar-2025

    Return of notice

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  10. 13-Nov-2024

    Return of notice

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  11. 17-Oct-2024

    Return of notice

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  12. 05-Sep-2024

    Return of notice

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  13. 22-Jul-2024

    Return of summons

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  14. 20-Jun-2024

    For Steps

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  15. 20-May-2024

    Return of notice

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  16. 14-Mar-2024

    Return of notice

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  17. 02-Feb-2024

    Return of notice

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  18. 21-Dec-2023

    Return of notice

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  19. 29-Nov-2023

    Return of notice

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  20. 07-Nov-2023

    Return of notice

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  21. 26-Sep-2023

    Return of notice

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  22. 11-Aug-2023

    Return of notice

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  23. 11-Jul-2023

    Return of notice

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  24. 17-Jun-2023

    Return of notice

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  25. 24-Mar-2023

    Return of notice

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  26. 27-Jan-2023

    Return of notice

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  27. 28-Nov-2022

    Return of notice

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  28. 12-Oct-2022

    For Objection and hearing

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  29. 17-Sep-2022

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  30. 01-Sep-2022

    For Objection and hearing

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  31. 27-Aug-2022

    For Objection and hearing

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  32. 11-Aug-2022

    For Objection and hearing

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  33. 03-Aug-2022

    For Objection and hearing

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  34. 02-Jul-2022

    for evidence.

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  35. 24-Jun-2022

    Appearance Of Parties

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  36. 24-Jun-2022

    Restored

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  37. 24-Jun-2022

    Return of notice

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  38. 02-Jun-2020

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary: The suit for permanent prohibitory injunction was decreed in favor of the plaintiff. The Court of Munsiff, Chengannur found that the plaintiff, through his sale deed No. 1651/10, has validly acquired title over the disputed property and is entitled to protection against the defendant's trespass and obstruction. The Court issued a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant from trespassing upon the property or obstructing the plaintiff's and his power of attorney holder's possession and enjoyment thereof. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  39. 02-Jun-2020

    Disposed

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  40. 26-May-2020

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  41. 18-May-2020

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  42. 26-Mar-2020

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  43. 23-Mar-2020

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  44. 20-Mar-2020

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  45. 14-Feb-2020

    Listed to

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  46. 07-Feb-2020

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  47. 01-Feb-2020

    Issues

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  48. 27-Jan-2020

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  49. 09-Jan-2020

    Call with IA

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  50. 03-Jan-2020

    Call with IA

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  51. 20-Dec-2019

    Call with IA

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  52. 03-Dec-2019

    Issues

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  53. 22-Nov-2019

    Issues

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  54. 16-Nov-2019

    Issues

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  55. 21-Oct-2019

    Written Statement

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  56. 03-Oct-2019

    Written Statement

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  57. 08-Jul-2019

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  58. 14-Jun-2019

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  59. 08-Apr-2019

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  60. 23-Mar-2019

    For Objection and hearing

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  61. 22-Mar-2019

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  62. 18-Mar-2019

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  63. 16-Mar-2019

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  64. 12-Mar-2019

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  65. 01-Mar-2019

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  66. 19-Feb-2019

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  67. 15-Feb-2019

    Objection

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  68. 08-Feb-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  69. 08-Feb-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200063/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The suit for permanent prohibitory injunction was decreed in favor of the plaintiff. The Court of Munsiff, Chengannur found that the plaintiff, through his sale deed No. 1651/10, has validly acquired title over the disputed property and is entitled to protection against the defendant's trespass and obstruction. The Court issued a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant from trespassing upon the property or obstructing the plaintiff's and his power of attorney holder's possession and enjoyment thereof. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case