Amalesh Sharma vs Omanakkuttan Advocate - SUDHEERKHAN. S — 200063/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Return of notice. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLAL290000802019
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
200089/2019
Filing Date
08-02-2019
Registration No
200063/2019
Registration Date
08-02-2019
Court
Munsiff Court, Chengannur
Judge
1-Munsiff, Chengannur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Amalesh Sharma
Adv. Ajayakumar. S
Respondent(s)
Omanakkuttan Advocate - SUDHEERKHAN. S
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff, Chengannur
Return of notice
Return of notice
Return of notice
Return of notice
Return of notice
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Return of notice | |
| 16-01-2026 | Return of notice | |
| 04-11-2025 | Return of notice | |
| 20-09-2025 | Return of notice | |
| 31-07-2025 | Return of notice |
Interim Orders
Summary: The suit for permanent prohibitory injunction was decreed in favor of the plaintiff. The Court of Munsiff, Chengannur found that the plaintiff, through his sale deed No. 1651/10, has validly acquired title over the disputed property and is entitled to protection against the defendant's trespass and obstruction. The Court issued a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant from trespassing upon the property or obstructing the plaintiff's and his power of attorney holder's possession and enjoyment thereof. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The suit for permanent prohibitory injunction was decreed in favor of the plaintiff. The Court of Munsiff, Chengannur found that the plaintiff, through his sale deed No. 1651/10, has validly acquired title over the disputed property and is entitled to protection against the defendant's trespass and obstruction. The Court issued a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant from trespassing upon the property or obstructing the plaintiff's and his power of attorney holder's possession and enjoyment thereof. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts