Jayasree vs Rekha Bai — 200185/2011

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section S26OVIIR1,3. Status: Order/ Judgement. Next hearing: 18th May 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLAL290000662011

Order/ Judgement

Next Hearing

18th May 2026

Filing Number

200185/2011

Filing Date

22-07-2011

Registration No

200185/2011

Registration Date

22-07-2011

Court

Munsiff Court, Chengannur

Judge

1-Munsiff, Chengannur

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code Section S26OVIIR1,3

Petitioner(s)

Jayasree

Adv. D. Vijaya Kumar

Venu

Respondent(s)

Rekha Bai

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff, Chengannur

10-04-2026

Order/ Judgement

30-03-2026

Order/ Judgement

18-03-2026

Order/ Judgement

11-03-2026

FOR HEARING

07-03-2026

Order/ Judgement

Interim Orders

24-02-2018
Judgement

Summary: The suit for declaration of easement rights over a pathway, boundary fixation, and injunction relief was dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove the existence of a 3-meter-wide pathway as claimed, and therefore lacked standing to seek the injunctive reliefs and boundary demarcation. While a partition deed from 1943 granted right-of-way along the defendant's property's southern side, the court's commissioned survey found only a narrower existing pathway (approximately 1-1.2 meters wide) that differed from what the plaintiff alleged, making her claims unsubstantiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The suit for declaration of easement rights over a pathway, boundary fixation, and injunction relief was dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove the existence of a 3-meter-wide pathway as claimed, and therefore lacked standing to seek the injunctive reliefs and boundary demarcation. While a partition deed from 1943 granted right-of-way along the defendant's property's southern side, the court's commissioned survey found only a narrower existing pathway (approximately 1-1.2 meters wide) that differed from what the plaintiff alleged, making her claims unsubstantiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Court, Chengannur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case