Jessy Abraham vs P.A Abraham — 200005/2022

Case under Ia/6/2025 Classification : Review Petition Section P.A AbrahamSherly Jacob. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 31st March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLAL290000292022

Filing Number

20010/2022

Filing Date

05-Jan-2022

Registration No

200005/2022

Registration Date

05-Jan-2022

Court

Munsiff Court, Chengannur

Judge

1-Munsiff, Chengannur

Decision Date

31-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Ia/6/2025 Classification : Review Petition Section P.A AbrahamSherly Jacob
Ia/7/2025 Classification : Advance Application Section P.A AbrahamJessy Abraham
Ia/8/2025 Classification : Advance Application Section P.A AbrahamJessy Abraham
Ia/1/2026 Classification : Application Seeking Extension of Time Section Jessy AbrahamP.A Abraham
Ia/2/2026 Classification : Petition Section P.A AbrahamJessy Abraham

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jessy Abraham

    Adv. AMMANCHY.C.N

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.P.A Abraham

  2. 2.Sherly Jacob

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: Jessy Abraham v. P.A Abraham and Sherly Jacob (OS 5/2022) Court Decision: The suit was dismissed with costs. The court found that plaintiff Jessy Abraham failed to establish her claim for a one-third share in the family properties through partition and declaration. Key Reasoning: The court rejected the plaintiff's allegation that property transfer deeds (executed in 1989, 1991, and 1992) were obtained through undue influence over her parents. The court found the plaintiff's claims were barred by limitation, lacked specific pleadings on undue influence, and were contradicted by her own witness testimony. Registered documents favoring the first defendant carried presumptions of validity that were not rebutted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  5. 26-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  6. 21-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  7. 19-Mar-2026

    For further hearing

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  8. 18-Mar-2026

    For further hearing

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  9. 17-Mar-2026

    For further hearing

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  10. 12-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  11. 06-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  12. 02-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  13. 23-Feb-2026

    For cross examination.

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  14. 12-Feb-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  15. 05-Feb-2026

    Further evidence

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  16. 27-Jan-2026

    Return of summons

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  17. 19-Jan-2026

    for evidence.

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  18. 15-Jan-2026

    for evidence.

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  19. 16-Dec-2025

    Listed to

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  20. 10-Dec-2025

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  21. 06-Dec-2025

    Issues

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  22. 04-Dec-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  23. 25-Oct-2025

    Objection

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  24. 18-Oct-2025

    Objection

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  25. 15-Oct-2025

    Objection

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  26. 22-Sep-2025

    OrderView PDF

  27. 22-Sep-2025

    For commission report

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  28. 23-Jul-2025

    Adjourned

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  29. 29-May-2025

    Objection

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  30. 28-Feb-2025

    Issues

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  31. 30-Jan-2025

    Issues

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  32. 11-Nov-2024

    Written Statement

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  33. 01-Oct-2024

    Written Statement

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  34. 23-Aug-2024

    Return of summons

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  35. 03-Jul-2024

    Return of summons

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  36. 13-Jun-2024

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  37. 23-May-2024

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  38. 12-Apr-2024

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  39. 24-Feb-2024

    Return of summons

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  40. 01-Feb-2024

    Return of summons

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  41. 12-Dec-2023

    Return of summons

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  42. 26-Oct-2023

    Return of summons

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  43. 25-Aug-2023

    Return of summons

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  44. 12-Jul-2023

    Return of summons

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  45. 05-Apr-2023

    Return of summons

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  46. 28-Feb-2023

    Return of summons

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  47. 17-Dec-2022

    Return of summons

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  48. 11-Oct-2022

    Return of summons

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  49. 05-Aug-2022

    Return of summons

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  50. 05-Apr-2022

    Written Statement

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  51. 08-Feb-2022

    Return of notice

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  52. 12-Jan-2022

    Return of notice

    Munsiff, Chengannur

  53. 05-Jan-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  54. 05-Jan-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200005/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Jessy Abraham v. P.A Abraham and Sherly Jacob (OS 5/2022) Court Decision: The suit was dismissed with costs. The court found that plaintiff Jessy Abraham failed to establish her claim for a one-third share in the family properties through partition and declaration. Key Reasoning: The court rejected the plaintiff's allegation that property transfer deeds (executed in 1989, 1991, and 1992) were obtained through undue influence over her parents. The court found the plaintiff's claims were barred by limitation, lacked specific pleadings on undue influence, and were contradicted by her own witness testimony. Registered documents favoring the first defendant carried presumptions of validity that were not rebutted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case