Umman Thimas vs Ponnamma Advocate - P G Sasidharan Pillai — 200339/2008
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 0S26OVIIR1,2. Status: Return of notice. Next hearing: 20th May 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLAL290000132008
Next Hearing
20th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
200339/2008
Filing Date
11-11-2008
Registration No
200339/2008
Registration Date
11-11-2008
Court
Munsiff Court, Chengannur
Judge
1-Munsiff, Chengannur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Umman Thimas
Adv. suresh Mathai
Respondent(s)
Ponnamma Advocate - P G Sasidharan Pillai
P C Mathai
Mariyamma verghese
Adv. SASIDHARAN PILLAI P G
S Rajeev
Adv. AJITHKUMAR P K,SASIDHARAN PILLAI P G
Subash
Adv. AJITHKUMAR P K,SASIDHARAN PILLAI P G
Ramani Sasi
Adv. SASIDHARAN PILLAI P G
T M Varghese
Adv. SASIDHARAN PILLAI P G
Chellamma
Adv. SASIDHARAN PILLAI P G
Sosamma Mathai
Adv. AJITHKUMAR P K,SASIDHARAN PILLAI P G
Susi Mathai
Adv. AJITHKUMAR P K,SASIDHARAN PILLAI P G
Aliyamma M M
Adv. AJITHKUMAR P K,SASIDHARAN PILLAI P G
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff, Chengannur
Return of notice
Return of notice
Bound over
for evidence.
Appearance Of Parties
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Return of notice | |
| 31-03-2026 | Return of notice | |
| 28-03-2026 | Bound over | |
| 23-03-2026 | for evidence. | |
| 09-03-2026 | Appearance Of Parties |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition filed by the first defendant (Ponnamma) under Section 145 of the Indian Evidence Act and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure was allowed. The court granted the petitioner a limited opportunity to further cross-examine PW1 (the third plaintiff) for the purpose of clarifying statements made during the earlier cross-examination by other defendants' counsel. The court found the request bona fide and necessary for justice, noting it would not introduce new facts or unduly prolong proceedings. Each party directed to bear its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition filed by the first defendant (Ponnamma) under Section 145 of the Indian Evidence Act and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure was allowed. The court granted the petitioner a limited opportunity to further cross-examine PW1 (the third plaintiff) for the purpose of clarifying statements made during the earlier cross-examination by other defendants' counsel. The court found the request bona fide and necessary for justice, noting it would not introduce new facts or unduly prolong proceedings. Each party directed to bear its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts