SABITHA vs M D THANKAPPAN Advocate - BIJU P — 209/2025

Case under Domestic Violent Act Section SEC 12. Status: Report on mediation. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Report on mediation Next hearing 15-Jun-2026 this date has passed

MC - MISCELLANEOUS & MAINTENANCE CASE

CNR: KLAL260045492025

Filing Number

6001/2025

Filing Date

29-Nov-2025

Registration No

209/2025

Registration Date

01-Dec-2025

Court

JFCM I, Kayamkulam

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate

Last updated 20-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Domestic Violent Act Section SEC 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SABITHA

    Adv. OMAR SALIM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M D THANKAPPAN Advocate - BIJU P

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Report on mediation

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Objection

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Objection

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  5. 29-Jan-2026

    Issue notice

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  6. 05-Dec-2025

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  7. 02-Dec-2025

    Interim OrderView PDF

    Summary: The petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was partly allowed. The court found a domestic relationship existed and that the petitioner (Sabitha, 43) established a prima facie case of domestic violence by the respondent (M D Thankappan, 60). An interim order was issued restraining the respondent from mentally and physically harassing the petitioner under Section 18(a) of the Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 02-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 29-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 209/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was partly allowed. The court found a domestic relationship existed and that the petitioner (Sabitha, 43) established a prima facie case of domestic violence by the respondent (M D Thankappan, 60). An interim order was issued restraining the respondent from mentally and physically harassing the petitioner under Section 18(a) of the Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case