Sasidharan vs Baby Samyuktha — 101150/2020
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED on 26th March 2026.
ST - SUMMARY TRIAL
CNR: KLAL260029352020
Filing Number
104950/2020
Filing Date
18-11-2020
Registration No
101150/2020
Registration Date
18-11-2020
Court
JFCM I, Kayamkulam
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
26th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--AQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sasidharan
Adv. Alexander Paniker
Respondent(s)
Baby Samyuktha
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Disposed
Order/Judgement
FOR HEARING
Order/Judgement
For further hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 19-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 17-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 12-03-2026 | For further hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Kayamkulam court acquitted Baby Samyuktha of cheque dishonor charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding that the disputed cheque was issued as security for the complainant standing surety in another case, not as discharge of debt. The court relied on the accused's undertaking (Exhibit D1), the complainant's unconvincing explanation for not reporting alleged document fabrication, and the chronology showing the cheque was issued before the related case was disposed of—circumstances that rebutted the statutory presumption and rendered the complainant's version improbable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Kayamkulam court acquitted Baby Samyuktha of cheque dishonor charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding that the disputed cheque was issued as security for the complainant standing surety in another case, not as discharge of debt. The court relied on the accused's undertaking (Exhibit D1), the complainant's unconvincing explanation for not reporting alleged document fabrication, and the chronology showing the cheque was issued before the related case was disposed of—circumstances that rebutted the statutory presumption and rendered the complainant's version improbable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts