State of Kerala (Police) vs Thameem — 896/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,147148,294(b)447,323,324,325,326,354,354(b)149. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 30th April 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLAL260018112022
Filing Number
1001815/2022
Filing Date
12-08-2022
Registration No
896/2022
Registration Date
12-08-2022
Court
JFCM I, Kayamkulam
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
520
Police Station
Kayamkulam Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Thameem
Anshad
Sadiq-Ul-Ameen
Adv. B.K.Niyas,KARTHIKA
Muhammad Nazoom
Muhsin Nasar
Muhammad Najoom
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Disposed
FOR HEARING
For evidence
No sitting notified
For evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-04-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 27-03-2026 | For evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | No sitting notified |
| 14-01-2026 | For evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 896/2022 - Summary The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kayamkulam acquitted all six accused (Thameem, Anshad, Sadiq-Ul-Ameen, Muhammad Nazoom, Muhsin Nasar, and Muhammad Najoom) of charges under IPC Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 294(b), 447, 323, 324, 325, 326, 354, and 354B. The court found that prosecution witnesses could not identify who caused the injuries in the alleged May 30, 2022 incident involving unlawful assembly and rioting. Without credible evidence establishing the accused's involvement or complicity, the prosecution failed to prove the essential elements of the offences, resulting in acquittal under Section 248(1) CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 896/2022 - Summary The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kayamkulam acquitted all six accused (Thameem, Anshad, Sadiq-Ul-Ameen, Muhammad Nazoom, Muhsin Nasar, and Muhammad Najoom) of charges under IPC Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 294(b), 447, 323, 324, 325, 326, 354, and 354B. The court found that prosecution witnesses could not identify who caused the injuries in the alleged May 30, 2022 incident involving unlawful assembly and rioting. Without credible evidence establishing the accused's involvement or complicity, the prosecution failed to prove the essential elements of the offences, resulting in acquittal under Section 248(1) CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts