Parvathi Nidhi Limited Represented Through Legal Manager Harilal N vs Anandavally Advocate - SREE BHAGAVATHY — 1000778/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section SECTION138AND142. Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 280 BNSS on 16th April 2026.
Crl.MP - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETN.
CNR: KLAL260015482025
e-Filing Number
14-05-2025
Filing Number
1474/2025
Filing Date
14-May-2025
Registration No
1000778/2025
Registration Date
15-May-2025
Court
JFCM I, Kayamkulam
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
16-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 280 BNSS
Last updated 12-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Parvathi Nidhi Limited Represented Through Legal Manager Harilal N
Adv. ANIL C D
Respondent(s)
-
1.Anandavally Advocate - SREE BHAGAVATHY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Apr-2026
JudgementView PDF
The court allowed the complainant's withdrawal petition in a cheque bounce case (Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act) filed by Parvathi Nidhi Limited against the accused Anandavally. The accused was acquitted under Section 280 BNSS as the court found the grounds for withdrawal satisfactory. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Disposed
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
11-Mar-2026
For Payment
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
27-Jan-2026
Appearance Of Parties
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
27-Nov-2025
For reports
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
23-Oct-2025
Appearance Of Parties
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
18-Sep-2025
Issue Bailable Warrant
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
27-Aug-2025
Appearance of Accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
28-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1000778/2025
The court allowed the complainant's withdrawal petition in a cheque bounce case (Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act) filed by Parvathi Nidhi Limited against the accused Anandavally. The accused was acquitted under Section 280 BNSS as the court found the grounds for withdrawal satisfactory. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts