State of Kerala (Police) vs Praveen Advocate - SUMESH. S, SUMESH. S — 100296/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,294(b),323,427,34. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 30th April 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLAL260005982021
Filing Number
100296/2021
Filing Date
03-03-2021
Registration No
100296/2021
Registration Date
03-03-2021
Court
JFCM I, Kayamkulam
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
106
Police Station
Vallikunnam Police Station
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Praveen Advocate - SUMESH. S, SUMESH. S
Vishnu
Adv. SARATH. S
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Disposed
FOR HEARING
No sitting notified
No sitting notified
82-83 Steps
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-04-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 16-03-2026 | No sitting notified |
| 23-02-2026 | No sitting notified |
| 23-12-2025 | 82-83 Steps |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Praveen & Vishnu (CC 296/2021) The Kayamkulam First Class Magistrate acquitted both accused Praveen and Vishnu of charges under IPC Sections 341 (wrongful restraint), 294(b) (obscene words), 323 (hurt), and 427 (mischief). The prosecution alleged the accused had assaulted and restrained the complainant on 6 February 2021 due to a debt dispute, causing injuries and breaking his spectacles. However, the key prosecution witness (PW1) testified he had no knowledge of the incident and never gave a statement to police; other material witnesses could not be produced despite coercive steps. The court found the prosecution failed to prove the essential ingredients of the offences, with no evidence of the accused's involvement or complicity, and accordingly acquitted them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Praveen & Vishnu (CC 296/2021) The Kayamkulam First Class Magistrate acquitted both accused Praveen and Vishnu of charges under IPC Sections 341 (wrongful restraint), 294(b) (obscene words), 323 (hurt), and 427 (mischief). The prosecution alleged the accused had assaulted and restrained the complainant on 6 February 2021 due to a debt dispute, causing injuries and breaking his spectacles. However, the key prosecution witness (PW1) testified he had no knowledge of the incident and never gave a statement to police; other material witnesses could not be produced despite coercive steps. The court found the prosecution failed to prove the essential ingredients of the offences, with no evidence of the accused's involvement or complicity, and accordingly acquitted them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts