Sudharma N vs Kavitha Dev Advocate - RAPHY RAJ. N — 100447/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Objection. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.

Objection Next hearing 08-Jul-2026

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLAL250006552023

e-Filing Number

22-12-2023

Filing Number

693/2023

Filing Date

22-Dec-2023

Registration No

100447/2023

Registration Date

22-Dec-2023

Court

Munsiffs Court, Kayamkulam

Judge

1-Munsiff

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26
Ia/15/2025 Classification : Section Sudharma NKavitha Dev
Ia/16/2025 Classification : Section Sudharma NKavitha Dev

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sudharma N

    Adv. A Shajahan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kavitha Dev Advocate - RAPHY RAJ. N

  2. 2.Jayakumar

    Adv. RAPHY RAJ. N

  3. 3.Adv.A.Ajikumar

  4. 4.Bindu.B

  5. 5.Dr.Amritha

  6. 6.Dr.Arundevaraj

  7. 7.Dr.Suchithra.K.S

  8. 8.Manaf

  9. 9.Muhammed Ashraf

  10. 10.Sheeba mol

  11. 11.Siddique

Case History

  1. 08-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 21-May-2026

    Objection

    Munsiff

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Objection

    Munsiff

  4. 03-Feb-2026

    Objection

    Munsiff

  5. 24-Nov-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff

  6. 31-Oct-2025

    Objection

    Munsiff

  7. 26-Sep-2025

    Adjourned

    Munsiff

  8. 05-Aug-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Sudharma N v. Kavitha Dev Advocate (100447/2023) Court: Munsiff Court, Kayamkulam Date: 5 August 2025 Outcome: Petition Dismissed The court dismissed a temporary injunction petition filed by Sudharma (plaintiff) seeking mandatory injunction to restore possession of disputed property and prohibitory injunction to stop construction by defendants. The court found no prima facie case, balance of convenience favored defendants, and plaintiff had adequate alternative remedy through pending suit OS.220/2024 under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 05-Aug-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff

  10. 29-Jul-2025

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff

  11. 15-Jul-2025

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff

  12. 14-Jul-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff

  13. 09-Jul-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff

  14. 05-Jul-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff

  15. 02-Jul-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff

  16. 28-Jun-2025

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff

  17. 19-Jun-2025

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff

  18. 31-May-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff

  19. 24-May-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff

  20. 17-Mar-2025

    Objection

    Munsiff

  21. 07-Mar-2025

    Return of notice

    Munsiff

  22. 25-Feb-2025

    Return of notice

    Munsiff

  23. 20-Feb-2025

    Objection

    Munsiff

  24. 14-Nov-2024

    Issues

    Munsiff

  25. 23-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  26. 01-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  27. 24-May-2024

    OrderView PDF

  28. 24-May-2024

    OrderView PDF

  29. 24-May-2024

    OrderView PDF

  30. 24-May-2024

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  31. 18-May-2024

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff

  32. 12-Apr-2024

    For Hearing

    Munsiff

  33. 09-Apr-2024

    For Hearing

    Munsiff

  34. 06-Apr-2024

    For Hearing

    Munsiff

  35. 04-Apr-2024

    For Hearing

    Munsiff

  36. 22-Mar-2024

    For commission report

    Munsiff

  37. 29-Feb-2024

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  38. 12-Jan-2024

    Return of summons

    Munsiff

  39. 22-Dec-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 22-Dec-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100447/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sudharma N v. Kavitha Dev Advocate (100447/2023) Court: Munsiff Court, Kayamkulam Date: 5 August 2025 Outcome: Petition Dismissed The court dismissed a temporary injunction petition filed by Sudharma (plaintiff) seeking mandatory injunction to restore possession of disputed property and prohibitory injunction to stop construction by defendants. The court found no prima facie case, balance of convenience favored defendants, and plaintiff had adequate alternative remedy through pending suit OS.220/2024 under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case