Ramachandran vs Sudheer — 100443/2018

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Call on. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLAL250006372018

Call on

Next Hearing

18th June 2026

Filing Number

100655/2018

Filing Date

21-11-2018

Registration No

100443/2018

Registration Date

21-11-2018

Court

Munsiffs Court, Kayamkulam

Judge

1-Munsiff

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code Section 26
IA/8/2025 Classification : Section RamachandranSudheer
IA/9/2025 Classification : Application To Recall Witness Section Sudheer

Petitioner(s)

Ramachandran

Adv. JABBARKUTTY. U

Respondent(s)

Sudheer

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff

04-06-2026

Call on

29-05-2026

For evidence

23-05-2026

For Defendent Evidence

27-03-2026

Listed to

16-03-2026

Adjourned

Interim Orders

27-06-2023
Judgement
22-08-2025
Order

Case Summary: 100443/2018 (Ramachandran v. Sudheer) Outcome: Petition Dismissed Defendant Sudheer's petition to recall and re-examine witnesses PW1-PW4 was dismissed by the Munsiff Court, Kayamkulam on 22 August 2025. The court found no sufficient reasons for recalling the witnesses under Order XVIII Rule 17 of the CPC, noting they had already been thoroughly cross-examined. The court determined the petition was filed to delay proceedings in this seven-year-old money recovery suit involving a disputed cheque, and allowing it would cause undue hardship to the plaintiff. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 100443/2018 (Ramachandran v. Sudheer) Outcome: Petition Dismissed Defendant Sudheer's petition to recall and re-examine witnesses PW1-PW4 was dismissed by the Munsiff Court, Kayamkulam on 22 August 2025. The court found no sufficient reasons for recalling the witnesses under Order XVIII Rule 17 of the CPC, noting they had already been thoroughly cross-examined. The court determined the petition was filed to delay proceedings in this seven-year-old money recovery suit involving a disputed cheque, and allowing it would cause undue hardship to the plaintiff. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiffs Court, Kayamkulam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case