Sheeja vs pathumuth — 405/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: For commission report. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.

For commission report Next hearing 04-Jul-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLAL250005882025

Filing Number

1026/2025

Filing Date

11-Dec-2025

Registration No

405/2025

Registration Date

12-Dec-2025

Court

Munsiffs Court, Kayamkulam

Judge

1-Munsiff

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sheeja

    Adv. SUDHAKARAN D

  2. 2.Rihana

    Adv. SUDHAKARAN D

  3. 3.Risana

    Adv. SUDHAKARAN D

  4. 4.amjid

    Adv. SUDHAKARAN D

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.pathumuth

  2. 2.Muhammad Hashim

  3. 3.Shahanas

  4. 4.Shabana

Case History

  1. 04-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    For commission report

    Munsiff

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Adjourned

    Munsiff

  4. 19-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case 405/2025 Summary: The Munsiff Court of Kayamkulam allowed the interim application (IA.1/2025) filed by petitioners Sheeja, Rihana, Risana, and Amjith against respondents Pathumuth, Muhammad Hashim, Shahanas, and Shabana on February 19, 2026. The court issued a restraining order prohibiting the respondents from widening a pathway on the south side of the plaintiffs' property or obstructing the construction of a building being carried out by the plaintiffs, pending further orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    exparte evidence

    Munsiff

  6. 19-Jan-2026

    Return of summons

    Munsiff

  7. 12-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 11-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 405/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 405/2025 Summary: The Munsiff Court of Kayamkulam allowed the interim application (IA.1/2025) filed by petitioners Sheeja, Rihana, Risana, and Amjith against respondents Pathumuth, Muhammad Hashim, Shahanas, and Shabana on February 19, 2026. The court issued a restraining order prohibiting the respondents from widening a pathway on the south side of the plaintiffs' property or obstructing the construction of a building being carried out by the plaintiffs, pending further orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case