Sheeja vs pathumuth — 405/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: For commission report. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLAL250005882025

For commission report

Next Hearing

04th July 2026

Filing Number

1026/2025

Filing Date

11-12-2025

Registration No

405/2025

Registration Date

12-12-2025

Court

Munsiffs Court, Kayamkulam

Judge

1-Munsiff

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 26
IA/1/2025 Classification : Injunction Application Section Sheejapathumuth
IA/2/2025 Classification : Commission Application Section Sheejapathumuth
IA/1/2026 Classification : Commission Application Section Sheejapathumuth
IA/2/2026 Classification : Advance Application Section Sheejapathumuth

Petitioner(s)

Sheeja

Adv. SUDHAKARAN D

Rihana

Adv. SUDHAKARAN D

Risana

Adv. SUDHAKARAN D

amjid

Adv. SUDHAKARAN D

Respondent(s)

pathumuth

Muhammad Hashim

Shahanas

Shabana

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff

23-03-2026

For commission report

16-03-2026

Adjourned

19-02-2026

exparte evidence

19-01-2026

Return of summons

12-12-2025

Return of summons

Interim Orders

19-02-2026
Order

Case 405/2025 Summary: The Munsiff Court of Kayamkulam allowed the interim application (IA.1/2025) filed by petitioners Sheeja, Rihana, Risana, and Amjith against respondents Pathumuth, Muhammad Hashim, Shahanas, and Shabana on February 19, 2026. The court issued a restraining order prohibiting the respondents from widening a pathway on the south side of the plaintiffs' property or obstructing the construction of a building being carried out by the plaintiffs, pending further orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 405/2025 Summary: The Munsiff Court of Kayamkulam allowed the interim application (IA.1/2025) filed by petitioners Sheeja, Rihana, Risana, and Amjith against respondents Pathumuth, Muhammad Hashim, Shahanas, and Shabana on February 19, 2026. The court issued a restraining order prohibiting the respondents from widening a pathway on the south side of the plaintiffs' property or obstructing the construction of a building being carried out by the plaintiffs, pending further orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiffs Court, Kayamkulam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case