Prasanna kumari vs Syamala Advocate - Saranya. G — 100350/2018

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Listed to. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.

Listed to Next hearing 04-Jul-2026

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLAL250005122018

Filing Number

100520/2018

Filing Date

18-Sep-2018

Registration No

100350/2018

Registration Date

18-Sep-2018

Court

Munsiffs Court, Kayamkulam

Judge

1-Munsiff

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Prasanna kumari

    Adv. SALIM. M. R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Syamala Advocate - Saranya. G

  2. 2.Raji

  3. 3.Latheesh alias Palani

Case History

  1. 04-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Listed to

    Munsiff

  3. 26-Feb-2026

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff

  4. 10-Feb-2026

    For commission report

    Munsiff

  5. 16-Jan-2026

    For commission report

    Munsiff

  6. 02-Dec-2025

    No sitting notified

    Munsiff

  7. 10-Nov-2025

    For commission report

    Munsiff

  8. 27-Oct-2025

    Objection

    Munsiff

  9. 30-Sep-2025

    Adjourned

    Munsiff

  10. 27-Aug-2025

    For commission report

    Munsiff

  11. 04-Aug-2025

    For commission report

    Munsiff

  12. 09-Jul-2025

    For commission report

    Munsiff

  13. 16-Jun-2025

    For commission report

    Munsiff

  14. 12-Feb-2025

    Listed to

    Munsiff

  15. 28-Jan-2025

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff

  16. 06-Jan-2025

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  17. 10-Dec-2024

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  18. 28-Nov-2024

    For Carry Out Amendment

    Munsiff

  19. 06-Nov-2024

    Objection

    Munsiff

  20. 14-Oct-2024

    Objection

    Munsiff

  21. 30-Sep-2024

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff

  22. 09-Sep-2024

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff

  23. 17-Aug-2024

    Bcf and steps

    Munsiff

  24. 24-Jul-2024

    Bcf and steps

    Munsiff

  25. 26-Jun-2024

    Bcf and steps

    Munsiff

  26. 21-May-2024

    Issues

    Munsiff

  27. 15-Mar-2024

    Issues

    Munsiff

  28. 17-Feb-2024

    Issues

    Munsiff

  29. 20-Jan-2024

    Issues

    Munsiff

  30. 16-Dec-2023

    Issues

    Munsiff

  31. 25-Nov-2023

    Issues

    Munsiff

  32. 16-Oct-2023

    Issues

    Munsiff

  33. 12-Sep-2023

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  34. 09-Aug-2023

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff

  35. 14-Jul-2023

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff

  36. 17-Jun-2023

    Appearance Of Parties

    Munsiff

  37. 13-Mar-2023

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  38. 23-Feb-2023

    Call on

    Munsiff

  39. 12-Jan-2023

    Call on

    Munsiff

  40. 26-Nov-2022

    Call on

    Munsiff

  41. 26-Oct-2022

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  42. 24-Sep-2022

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff

  43. 27-Aug-2022

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff

  44. 29-Jul-2022

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff

  45. 18-Jul-2022

    Appearance Of Parties

    Munsiff

  46. 04-Jul-2022

    Restored

    Munsiff

  47. 04-Jul-2022

    Appearance Of Parties

    Munsiff

  48. 04-Jul-2022

    Appearance Of Parties

    Munsiff

  49. 23-Sep-2021

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: OS 350/2018 Outcome: Suit DECREED with permanent injunction granted. The Munsiff's Court in Kayamkulam ruled in favor of plaintiff Prasanna Kumari in her suit for permanent injunction filed against three defendants (Syamala, Raji, and Latheesh alias Palani). The court issued a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from encroaching, annexing, or making further constructions on the plaintiff's one-meter-wide pathway property (Plaint B Schedule). The defendants were also ordered to pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff. The defendants' failure to file a written statement resulted in proceedings under Order VIII Rule 10, CPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  50. 23-Sep-2021

    Disposed

    Munsiff

  51. 22-Sep-2021

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff

  52. 20-Sep-2021

    For Hearing

    Munsiff

  53. 16-Sep-2021

    For evidence

    Munsiff

  54. 09-Sep-2021

    For evidence

    Munsiff

  55. 24-Aug-2021

    For evidence

    Munsiff

  56. 12-Jul-2021

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  57. 09-Apr-2021

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  58. 20-Jan-2021

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  59. 02-Dec-2020

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  60. 08-Sep-2020

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  61. 29-Jun-2020

    Adjourned

    Munsiff

  62. 24-Mar-2020

    Adjourned

    Munsiff

  63. 26-Nov-2019

    No sitting notified

    Munsiff

  64. 10-Jul-2019

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  65. 11-Apr-2019

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  66. 12-Feb-2019

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  67. 22-Nov-2018

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  68. 20-Oct-2018

    No sitting notified

    Munsiff

  69. 18-Sep-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  70. 18-Sep-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100350/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS 350/2018 Outcome: Suit DECREED with permanent injunction granted. The Munsiff's Court in Kayamkulam ruled in favor of plaintiff Prasanna Kumari in her suit for permanent injunction filed against three defendants (Syamala, Raji, and Latheesh alias Palani). The court issued a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from encroaching, annexing, or making further constructions on the plaintiff's one-meter-wide pathway property (Plaint B Schedule). The defendants were also ordered to pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff. The defendants' failure to file a written statement resulted in proceedings under Order VIII Rule 10, CPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case