Rani Raghavan vs The Manager/ Site in charge,Vishwa Samudra Engineering Pvt.Ltd,Site Office,Karunagappally — 346/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section section 26 order 7 Rule 1 and 2. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED WITH COST on 31st March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLAL250004892025

Filing Number

967/2025

Filing Date

16-Oct-2025

Registration No

346/2025

Registration Date

17-Oct-2025

Court

Munsiffs Court, Kayamkulam

Judge

1-Munsiff

Decision Date

31-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED WITH COST

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section section 26 order 7 Rule 1 and 2
Ia/1/2025 Classification : Injunction Application Section Rani Raghavan
Ia/2/2025 Classification : Commission Application Section Rani Raghavan
Ia/3/2025 Classification : Petition to Accept Photocopy Section Rani Raghavan
Ia/1/2026 Classification : Sanction Petition Section Rani RaghavanThe Manager/ Site in charge,Vishwa Samudra Engineering Pvt.Ltd,Site Office,Karunagappally

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rani Raghavan

    Adv. M R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Manager/ Site in charge,Vishwa Samudra Engineering Pvt.Ltd,Site Office,Karunagappally

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: 346/2025 Court Decision: The Munsiff Court of Kayamkulam granted Rani Raghavan's suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against Vishwa Samudra Engineering Pvt. Ltd., restraining the defendant and its employees from trespassing, demolishing boundary fencing, or forcefully taking possession of her property before government land acquisition proceedings are completed. The defendant was also ordered to pay the suit costs. Key Reasoning: The court found that the contractor defendant has no authority to forcefully occupy private land during ongoing National Highway 66 reconstruction; only the government can acquire property and take possession after formal acquisition proceedings conclude. The plaintiff's unchallenged evidence established her absolute ownership through intestate succession and demonstrated the defendant's employees' unlawful attempts to demolish fencing on October 14, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Munsiff

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Return of summons

    Munsiff

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Further evidence

    Munsiff

  7. 21-Feb-2026

    For commission report

    Munsiff

  8. 04-Feb-2026

    exparte evidence

    Munsiff

  9. 06-Dec-2025

    Adjourned

    Munsiff

  10. 15-Nov-2025

    exparte evidence

    Munsiff

  11. 17-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 16-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 346/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 346/2025 Court Decision: The Munsiff Court of Kayamkulam granted Rani Raghavan's suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against Vishwa Samudra Engineering Pvt. Ltd., restraining the defendant and its employees from trespassing, demolishing boundary fencing, or forcefully taking possession of her property before government land acquisition proceedings are completed. The defendant was also ordered to pay the suit costs. Key Reasoning: The court found that the contractor defendant has no authority to forcefully occupy private land during ongoing National Highway 66 reconstruction; only the government can acquire property and take possession after formal acquisition proceedings conclude. The plaintiff's unchallenged evidence established her absolute ownership through intestate succession and demonstrated the defendant's employees' unlawful attempts to demolish fencing on October 14, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case