Rajendran. vs Raveendranathan — 100475/2013

Case under For Fixation of Boundary Section 26. Status: Objection. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLAL250004812013

Objection

Next Hearing

02nd June 2026

Filing Number

100230/2013

Filing Date

09-12-2013

Registration No

100475/2013

Registration Date

09-12-2013

Court

Munsiffs Court, Kayamkulam

Judge

1-Munsiff

Acts & Sections

For fixation of boundary Section 26
IA/1/2026 Classification : Amendment Application Section Rajendran.Raveendranathan
IA/2/2026 Classification : Sanction Petition Section Rajendran.Raveendranathan
IA/3/2026 Classification : Petition Section Rajendran.Raveendranathan
IA/4/2026 Classification : Petition Section Rajendran.Raveendranathan

Petitioner(s)

Rajendran.

Adv. Parvathy sekhar

Respondent(s)

Raveendranathan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff

19-05-2026

Objection

01-04-2026

Objection

26-03-2026

Objection

21-03-2026

Call on

12-03-2026

Call on

Interim Orders

24-06-2015
Order Number 1
29-05-2025
Order
29-05-2025
Order

Summary: The petition filed by Rajendran (plaintiff) under Order XXVI Rule 10(3) of the CPC, 1908 to remit the commission report and survey plan for correction of defects was allowed. The court found that the commissioner's report contained material errors, including incorrect reference to "first schedule property" instead of "second schedule" and lack of clarity regarding boundary lines of the scheduled properties. The commissioner has been directed to rectify these defects and file the corrected report within seven days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed by Rajendran (plaintiff) under Order XXVI Rule 10(3) of the CPC, 1908 to remit the commission report and survey plan for correction of defects was allowed. The court found that the commissioner's report contained material errors, including incorrect reference to "first schedule property" instead of "second schedule" and lack of clarity regarding boundary lines of the scheduled properties. The commissioner has been directed to rectify these defects and file the corrected report within seven days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiffs Court, Kayamkulam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case