Union Bank Of India, Branch Kayamkulam, Rep By The Manager Sincere. P.v vs Raju. K — 100268/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26OrderVIIRule1andOrderXXXIV. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED IN TERMS OF COMPROMISE. on 17th March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLAL250004152022
e-Filing Number
03-08-2022
Filing Number
100408/2022
Filing Date
05-Aug-2022
Registration No
100268/2022
Registration Date
05-Aug-2022
Court
Munsiffs Court, Kayamkulam
Judge
1-Munsiff
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED IN TERMS OF COMPROMISE.
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Union Bank Of India, Branch Kayamkulam, Rep By The Manager Sincere. P.v
Adv. BOBAN VIJAYAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.Raju. K
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
The Munsiff Court of Kayamkulam decreed the suit filed by Union Bank of India against defendant Raju K. based on a mediation settlement between both parties. The court found the terms of the mediation agreement to be lawful and executable, incorporated it into the decree, and made no order regarding costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Munsiff
-
12-Mar-2026
Report on mediation
Munsiff
-
11-Feb-2026
Report on mediation
Munsiff
-
03-Feb-2026
Appearance Of Parties
Munsiff
-
29-Nov-2025
Call on
Munsiff
-
07-Nov-2025
Appearance Of Parties
Munsiff
-
04-Nov-2025
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
15-Oct-2025
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
23-Sep-2025
exparte evidence
Munsiff
-
11-Aug-2025
Call on
Munsiff
-
15-Jul-2025
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
15-Jul-2025
Disposed
Munsiff
-
25-Oct-2022
JudgementView PDF
-
25-Oct-2022
—
Munsiff
-
19-Oct-2022
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
12-Oct-2022
For evidence
Munsiff
-
29-Sep-2022
For evidence
Munsiff
-
10-Aug-2022
Return of summons
Munsiff
-
08-Aug-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Aug-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 100268/2022
The Munsiff Court of Kayamkulam decreed the suit filed by Union Bank of India against defendant Raju K. based on a mediation settlement between both parties. The court found the terms of the mediation agreement to be lawful and executable, incorporated it into the decree, and made no order regarding costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts