Anithakumari vs Anilkumar Advocate - JABBARKUTTY. U — 100272/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED WITH COST on 17th March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLAL250003822023
Filing Number
382/2023
Filing Date
19-Jul-2023
Registration No
100272/2023
Registration Date
19-Jul-2023
Court
Munsiffs Court, Kayamkulam
Judge
1-Munsiff
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED WITH COST
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Anithakumari
Adv. Hameed Manthalasseril
Respondent(s)
-
1.Anilkumar Advocate - JABBARKUTTY. U
-
2.Sreelekha
Adv. JABBARKUTTY. U
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: Anithakumari v. Anilkumar & Sreelekha (OS 272/2023) Court Decision: The Munsiff Court, Kayamkulam granted a permanent prohibitory injunction in favor of plaintiff Anithakumari, restraining the defendants from trespassing on her 2-acre property, obstructing construction/measurement activities, destroying boundary marks, or opening new roads through the property. The defendants were also ordered to pay litigation costs. Key Reasoning: The court found the plaintiff's unchallenged evidence—including a 2020 Settlement deed establishing ownership and clear boundary marks—conclusively proved her absolute ownership. Since the defendants failed to file a written statement despite appearing through counsel, they were proceeded against ex parte under CPC Order VIII Rule 10. The defendants' threat to prevent construction unless the plaintiff sold 2 cents of land was deemed an unlawful interference with her property rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Munsiff
-
16-Mar-2026
Adjourned
Munsiff
-
03-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
10-Feb-2026
exparte evidence
Munsiff
-
29-Jan-2026
exparte evidence
Munsiff
-
06-Jan-2026
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
12-Nov-2025
Adjourned
Munsiff
-
25-Sep-2025
Call on
Munsiff
-
02-Sep-2025
Call on
Munsiff
-
26-Jul-2025
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
28-May-2025
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
19-Mar-2025
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
12-Nov-2024
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
21-Aug-2024
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
23-May-2024
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
06-Feb-2024
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
24-Jan-2024
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
21-Oct-2023
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
07-Aug-2023
For commission report
Munsiff
-
19-Jul-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Jul-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 100272/2023
Case Summary: Anithakumari v. Anilkumar & Sreelekha (OS 272/2023) Court Decision: The Munsiff Court, Kayamkulam granted a permanent prohibitory injunction in favor of plaintiff Anithakumari, restraining the defendants from trespassing on her 2-acre property, obstructing construction/measurement activities, destroying boundary marks, or opening new roads through the property. The defendants were also ordered to pay litigation costs. Key Reasoning: The court found the plaintiff's unchallenged evidence—including a 2020 Settlement deed establishing ownership and clear boundary marks—conclusively proved her absolute ownership. Since the defendants failed to file a written statement despite appearing through counsel, they were proceeded against ex parte under CPC Order VIII Rule 10. The defendants' threat to prevent construction unless the plaintiff sold 2 cents of land was deemed an unlawful interference with her property rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts