Pavithran vs Bhasuran Advocate - PRATHAP G. PADICAL — 100236/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Listed to. Next hearing: 20th August 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLAL250003632022

Listed to

Next Hearing

20th August 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

100356/2022

Filing Date

02-07-2022

Registration No

100236/2022

Registration Date

02-07-2022

Court

Munsiffs Court, Kayamkulam

Judge

1-Munsiff

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code Section 26
IA/6/2025 Classification : Advance Application Section PavithranBhasuran

Petitioner(s)

Pavithran

Adv. SREEKUMAR. K

Respondent(s)

Bhasuran Advocate - PRATHAP G. PADICAL

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff

08-04-2026

Listed to

21-03-2026

Call on

09-03-2026

For further hearing

24-02-2026

For Steps

12-01-2026

Call on

Interim Orders

19-08-2025
Order
19-08-2025
Order

Summary: The Munsiff Court of Kayamkulam allowed the petition filed by the defendant (Bhasuran) under Sections 151 and 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The court permitted the defendant to re-open the plaintiff's evidence and allowed his counsel to recall the plaintiff (PW1) and witnesses for cross-examination in the partition and injunction suit. The court found that reopening evidence would ensure a fair trial and prevent injustice, as the defendant was previously set ex-parte due to non-appearance. No costs were ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Munsiff Court of Kayamkulam allowed the petition filed by the defendant (Bhasuran) under Sections 151 and 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The court permitted the defendant to re-open the plaintiff's evidence and allowed his counsel to recall the plaintiff (PW1) and witnesses for cross-examination in the partition and injunction suit. The court found that reopening evidence would ensure a fair trial and prevent injustice, as the defendant was previously set ex-parte due to non-appearance. No costs were ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiffs Court, Kayamkulam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case