Fiji Rajeev vs Binu Mathai Advocate - K.K.Thomas — 100275/2014
Case under Suit for Declaration \ Section 26. Status: Listed to. Next hearing: 22nd May 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLAL250003542014
Next Hearing
22nd May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
100309/2014
Filing Date
01-07-2014
Registration No
100275/2014
Registration Date
01-07-2014
Court
Munsiffs Court, Kayamkulam
Judge
1-Munsiff
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Fiji Rajeev
Adv. N.Raveendran and M.R.Salim
Rithika.B.Lekshmi
Adv. N.Raveendran and M.R.Salim,M R
Respondent(s)
Binu Mathai Advocate - K.K.Thomas
Senior Regional Manager
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff
Listed to
For cross examination.
Listed to
for evidence.
For evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Listed to | |
| 09-03-2026 | For cross examination. | |
| 06-02-2026 | Listed to | |
| 28-01-2026 | for evidence. | |
| 19-01-2026 | For evidence |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiffs. The court declared the plaintiffs' right, title, and possession over the petrol pump property and directed them to conduct operations per the 1998 agreement. Mandatory injunctions were issued ordering the first defendant to unfreeze the bank account and the second defendant (HPCL) to transfer the petrol pump license to the plaintiffs' names, while prohibitory injunctions restrained both defendants from obstructing operations or canceling the license. Each party bears their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiffs. The court declared the plaintiffs' right, title, and possession over the petrol pump property and directed them to conduct operations per the 1998 agreement. Mandatory injunctions were issued ordering the first defendant to unfreeze the bank account and the second defendant (HPCL) to transfer the petrol pump license to the plaintiffs' names, while prohibitory injunctions restrained both defendants from obstructing operations or canceling the license. Each party bears their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts