The South Indian Bank Ltd vs Muhammed Arif Khan Advocate - ANZARI. C. M — 100213/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26(1) and (2). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED AS NOT PRESSED on 20th May 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLAL250003182024
e-Filing Number
08-07-2024
Filing Number
100360/2024
Filing Date
09-Jul-2024
Registration No
100213/2024
Registration Date
09-Jul-2024
Court
Munsiffs Court, Kayamkulam
Judge
1-Munsiff
Decision Date
20-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED AS NOT PRESSED
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The South Indian Bank Ltd
Adv. ADV P ANIL KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.Muhammed Arif Khan Advocate - ANZARI. C. M
-
2.Ashraf Y
Adv. ANZARI. C. M
-
3.Rahiyanath
Adv. ANZARI. C. M
-
4.Ahammed Kunju
Adv. ANZARI. C. M
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-May-2026
JudgementView PDF
The Munsiff Court of Kayamkulam dismissed Original Suit 213/2024 filed by The South Indian Bank Ltd against Muhammed Arif Khan, Ashraf Y, Rahiyanath, and Ahammed Kunju on 20 May 2026. The plaintiff filed a memo stating the matter had been settled between the parties and requested to not press the suit, which the court allowed, resulting in dismissal as not pressed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-May-2026
Disposed
Munsiff
-
16-Mar-2026
Adjourned
Munsiff
-
06-Feb-2026
Appearance Of Parties
Munsiff
-
24-Nov-2025
Call on
Munsiff
-
12-Sep-2025
Call on
Munsiff
-
25-Jul-2025
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
15-Jul-2025
exparte evidence
Munsiff
-
11-Jun-2025
exparte evidence
Munsiff
-
29-Nov-2024
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
09-Aug-2024
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
09-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 100213/2024
The Munsiff Court of Kayamkulam dismissed Original Suit 213/2024 filed by The South Indian Bank Ltd against Muhammed Arif Khan, Ashraf Y, Rahiyanath, and Ahammed Kunju on 20 May 2026. The plaintiff filed a memo stating the matter had been settled between the parties and requested to not press the suit, which the court allowed, resulting in dismissal as not pressed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts