Jayalekshmi Kunjamma vs Girinath Advocate - SAJI SK, SAJI SK — 100170/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Section26OrderVIIRule1&2. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.

Written Statement Next hearing 03-Jul-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLAL250002382025

e-Filing Number

29-05-2025

Filing Number

281/2025

Filing Date

29-May-2025

Registration No

100170/2025

Registration Date

29-May-2025

Court

Munsiffs Court, Kayamkulam

Judge

1-Munsiff

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Section26OrderVIIRule1&2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jayalekshmi Kunjamma

    Adv. SREENIVAS R

  2. 2.Jayakrishnan

    Adv. SREENIVAS R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Girinath Advocate - SAJI SK, SAJI SK

Case History

  1. 03-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  3. 18-Dec-2025

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  4. 15-Nov-2025

    OrderView PDF

  5. 15-Nov-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Court of the Munsiff, Kayamkulam dismissed the petitioners' petition seeking temporary injunction under Order XXXIX of the CPC. The petitioners failed to establish a prima facie case or favorable balance of convenience, as the commissioner's report revealed encroachment by the petitioners over a shared pathway. The court found that granting the injunction would cause irreparable injury to the respondents and maintained status quo pending disposal of both suits. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 15-Nov-2025

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  7. 05-Nov-2025

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff

  8. 25-Oct-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff

  9. 05-Aug-2025

    Objection

    Munsiff

  10. 05-Jul-2025

    Return of summons

    Munsiff

  11. 26-Jun-2025

    Return of summons

    Munsiff

  12. 11-Jun-2025

    For Objection and hearing

    Munsiff

  13. 29-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 29-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100170/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Court of the Munsiff, Kayamkulam dismissed the petitioners' petition seeking temporary injunction under Order XXXIX of the CPC. The petitioners failed to establish a prima facie case or favorable balance of convenience, as the commissioner's report revealed encroachment by the petitioners over a shared pathway. The court found that granting the injunction would cause irreparable injury to the respondents and maintained status quo pending disposal of both suits. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case