Jayaprasad vs Travancore Devaswam Board Advocate - RAVINDRANATH R — 100110/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 24th March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLAL250001762021
Filing Number
100174/2021
Filing Date
31-Mar-2021
Registration No
100110/2021
Registration Date
31-Mar-2021
Court
Munsiffs Court, Kayamkulam
Judge
1-Munsiff
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jayaprasad
Adv. REMANAN PILLAI. S
Respondent(s)
-
1.Travancore Devaswam Board Advocate - RAVINDRANATH R
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: Jayaprasad v. Travancore Devaswom Board (OS 110/2021) The Munsiff Court dismissed Jayaprasad's suit seeking declaration of title and permanent injunction over 1.62 acres of property. The court found that Jayaprasad failed to prove his claimed ownership through an alleged oral transfer from Kanakku Govindan Velayudhan to his father in 1970. Per revenue records (BTR), the property belongs to Travancore Devaswom Board under old survey 158/1, not survey 157/14 as plaintiff contended. The court held that in title declaration suits, the burden rests entirely on the plaintiff to establish clear title—mere criticism of the defendant's records is insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Munsiff
-
18-Mar-2026
Order/Judgement
Munsiff
-
03-Mar-2026
Order/ Judgement
Munsiff
-
18-Feb-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
30-Jan-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
08-Jan-2026
For further hearing
Munsiff
-
19-Dec-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
27-Nov-2025
Call on
Munsiff
-
11-Nov-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
27-Oct-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
16-Oct-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
29-Sep-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
16-Sep-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
27-Aug-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
21-Aug-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
13-Aug-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
29-Jul-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
11-Jul-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
24-Jun-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
10-Jun-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
24-May-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
07-Apr-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
24-Mar-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
14-Mar-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
28-Feb-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
15-Feb-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
04-Feb-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
24-Jan-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
14-Jan-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
07-Jan-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
13-Dec-2024
OrderView PDF
-
13-Dec-2024
OrderView PDF
-
13-Dec-2024
OrderView PDF
-
13-Dec-2024
OrderView PDF
-
13-Dec-2024
For evidence
Munsiff
-
07-Dec-2024
Orders in IA
Munsiff
-
29-Nov-2024
Objection
Munsiff
-
27-Nov-2024
Objection
Munsiff
-
19-Nov-2024
Objection
Munsiff
-
23-Oct-2024
Call on
Munsiff
-
19-Oct-2024
Order/Judgement
Munsiff
-
10-Oct-2024
for evidence.
Munsiff
-
24-Sep-2024
for evidence.
Munsiff
-
23-Sep-2024
for evidence.
Munsiff
-
03-Sep-2024
for evidence.
Munsiff
-
02-Jul-2024
Listed to
Munsiff
-
24-May-2024
Bcf and steps
Munsiff
-
16-Mar-2024
Issues
Munsiff
-
12-Feb-2024
Issues
Munsiff
-
15-Dec-2023
Issues
Munsiff
-
06-Oct-2023
Issues
Munsiff
-
23-Aug-2023
No sitting notified
Munsiff
-
03-Jul-2023
No sitting notified
Munsiff
-
12-Jan-2023
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
17-Oct-2022
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
19-May-2022
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
29-Jan-2022
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
30-Sep-2021
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
29-Jul-2021
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
21-Jul-2021
Call on
Munsiff
-
26-Jun-2021
Call on
Munsiff
-
31-Mar-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-Mar-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 100110/2021
Case Summary: Jayaprasad v. Travancore Devaswom Board (OS 110/2021) The Munsiff Court dismissed Jayaprasad's suit seeking declaration of title and permanent injunction over 1.62 acres of property. The court found that Jayaprasad failed to prove his claimed ownership through an alleged oral transfer from Kanakku Govindan Velayudhan to his father in 1970. Per revenue records (BTR), the property belongs to Travancore Devaswom Board under old survey 158/1, not survey 157/14 as plaintiff contended. The court held that in title declaration suits, the burden rests entirely on the plaintiff to establish clear title—mere criticism of the defendant's records is insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts